C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. On that note, looking into C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW), we weren't too upbeat about how things were going.
什麼基礎的基本趨勢可以表明一家公司可能正在衰退? 衰退中的企業通常有兩個基礎趨勢,首先是資本回報率(ROCE)下降,其次是使用的資本基礎下降。 基本上,公司在其投資上的收益在減少,同時總資產也在減少。 在這一點上,考慮到羅賓遜物流(納斯達克:CHRW),我們對情況並不太樂觀。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
理解已投資資本回報率(ROCE)
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, this is the formula:
對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人來說,它衡量的是公司從其業務中使用的資本生成的稅前利潤的數量。 計算羅賓遜物流的這一指標的公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.19 = US$625m ÷ (US$5.6b - US$2.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.19 = US$62500萬 ÷ (US$56億 - US$2.2b)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
Therefore, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an ROCE of 19%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 13% generated by the Logistics industry.
因此,羅賓遜物流的資本回報率爲19%。就其本身而言,這是一項標準回報,但比物流行業產生的13%要好得多。
In the above chart we have measured C.H. Robinson Worldwide's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering C.H. Robinson Worldwide for free.
在以上圖表中,我們比較了羅賓遜物流之前的資本回報率與其之前的表現,但未來的表現無疑更爲重要。如果您願意,可以免費查看覆蓋羅賓遜物流的分析師的預測。
What Can We Tell From C.H. Robinson Worldwide's ROCE Trend?
我們可以從羅賓遜物流的資本回報率趨勢中得出什麼?
In terms of C.H. Robinson Worldwide's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 28% that they were earning five years ago. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect C.H. Robinson Worldwide to turn into a multi-bagger.
就羅賓遜物流歷史資本回報率的變化來看,這一趨勢並沒有讓人感到信心。很不幸的是,資本回報率從五年前的28%降低了。此外,值得注意的是,業務中所使用的資本量保持相對穩定。這樣的組合可能表明這是一個成熟的業務,仍有地方可以部署資本,但所獲得的回報卻可能因爲新的競爭或利潤率的降低而沒有那麼高。如果這些趨勢持續下去,我們不希望羅賓遜物流會轉變爲一個多倍收益的股票。
What We Can Learn From C.H. Robinson Worldwide's ROCE
我們可以從羅賓遜物流的資本回報率中學到什麼
In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. But investors must be expecting an improvement of sorts because over the last five yearsthe stock has delivered a respectable 64% return. Regardless, we don't feel too comfortable with the fundamentals so we'd be steering clear of this stock for now.
最後,相同資本下回報率降低的趨勢通常並不意味着我們在關注一隻成長型股票。但投資者必須期待某種改善,因爲在過去五年裏,該股票提供了可觀的64%回報。無論如何,我們對基本面並不感到太舒適,因此現在我們會避免購買這隻股票。
C.H. Robinson Worldwide does have some risks, we noticed 2 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.
羅賓遜物流確實存在一些風險,我們注意到了2個警告信號(還有1個不容忽視的信號),我們認爲您應該了解這些。
While C.H. Robinson Worldwide may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
雖然羅賓遜物流目前可能未能獲得最高的回報,但我們已整理了一份當前資本回報率超過25%的公司的名單。請在這裏查看這份免費名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。