share_log

Institutions Along With Public Companies Who Hold Considerable Shares InHUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) Come Under Pressure; Lose 11% of Holdings Value

Institutions Along With Public Companies Who Hold Considerable Shares InHUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) Come Under Pressure; Lose 11% of Holdings Value

機構和持有HUYA Inc.(紐交所:HUYA)大量股份的上市公司受到壓力;損失了11%的持有價值
Simply Wall St ·  12/16 18:06

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • HUYA's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Tencent Holdings Limited with a 66% stake
  • Institutions own 18% of HUYA
  • 虎牙的公衆公司持有情況表明,關鍵決策受到大型股東的影響。
  • 該公司的最大股東是騰訊控股,持股比例爲66%。
  • 機構持有18%的虎牙股份。

A look at the shareholders of HUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 66% to be precise, is public companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看虎牙(紐交所代碼:HUYA)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說,是公衆公司,約佔66%。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While the holdings of public companies took a hit after last week's 11% price drop, institutions with their 18% holdings also suffered.

雖然公共公司的持股在上週價格下跌11%後受到衝擊,但持有18%股份的機構也遭受了損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HUYA.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於虎牙的不同持股群體。

big
NYSE:HUYA Ownership Breakdown December 16th 2024
紐交所:虎牙持股結構 2024年12月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HUYA?

機構持股告訴我們關於虎牙什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

We can see that HUYA does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of HUYA, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到虎牙確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看虎牙過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:HUYA Earnings and Revenue Growth December 16th 2024
紐交所:虎牙 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月16日

HUYA is not owned by hedge funds. Tencent Holdings Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 66% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.7% and 2.3% of the stock.

虎牙並不被對沖基金持有。騰訊控股目前是最大的股東,持有66%的流通股。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有控股權。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約3.7%和2.3%的股票。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of HUYA

虎牙的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our information suggests that HUYA Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It has a market capitalization of just US$708m, and the board has only US$2.1m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我們的信息顯示虎牙的內部人士擁有不足1%的股份。它的市值僅爲70800萬美元,董事會僅擁有價值210萬美元的股票。許多人傾向於看到擁有更大股份的董事會。接下來的一個好步驟可能是查看這份關於內部買入和賣出的免費總結。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over HUYA. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆擁有16%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對虎牙有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定能左右決策,但確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 66% of HUYA stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上市公司目前擁有虎牙股份的66%。雖然很難確切說,但這表明他們有交織的業務利益。這可能是一種戰略性股份,因此值得關注這一領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HUYA better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with HUYA .

考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但是要更好地理解虎牙,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該關注我們發現的虎牙的一個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論