Columbia Sportswear Company's (NASDAQ:COLM) Stock Has Shown A Decent Performance: Have Financials A Role To Play?
Columbia Sportswear Company's (NASDAQ:COLM) Stock Has Shown A Decent Performance: Have Financials A Role To Play?
Most readers would already know that Columbia Sportswear's (NASDAQ:COLM) stock increased by 6.2% over the past three months. Given that stock prices are usually aligned with a company's financial performance in the long-term, we decided to investigate if the company's decent financials had a hand to play in the recent price move. Specifically, we decided to study Columbia Sportswear's ROE in this article.
大多數讀者可能已經知道,哥倫比亞戶外(納斯達克:COLM)的股票在過去三個月上漲了6.2%。考慮到股票價格通常與公司長期的財務表現一致,我們決定調查一下公司的良好財務狀況是否對最近的價格變動有所影響。具體來說,我們決定在這篇文章中研究哥倫比亞戶外的ROE。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.
ROE,即淨資產收益率,是評估公司如何有效地利用來自股東投資的工具。簡單來說,它用於評估公司相對於其股本的盈利能力。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:
淨資產收益率可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Columbia Sportswear is:
因此,根據上述公式,哥倫比亞戶外的ROE爲:
12% = US$214m ÷ US$1.8b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
12% = US$21400萬 ÷ US$18億(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.12 in profit.
「回報」指的是公司在過去一年中的收益。這意味着每1美元的股東權益,公司產生了0.12美元的利潤。
What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?
roe與盈利增長有何關係?
Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features.
到目前爲止,我們已經了解到ROE衡量了一家公司盈利的效率。我們現在需要評估公司再投資或「保留」多少利潤以便於未來的增長,這將有助於我們了解公司的增長潛力。假設其他條件不變,擁有更高股本回報率和更高利潤留存的公司通常相比沒有相同特點的公司具有更高的增長率。
A Side By Side comparison of Columbia Sportswear's Earnings Growth And 12% ROE
哥倫比亞戶外的盈利增長與12% ROE的並行比較
To begin with, Columbia Sportswear seems to have a respectable ROE. Even when compared to the industry average of 13% the company's ROE looks quite decent. Given the circumstances, we can't help but wonder why Columbia Sportswear saw little to no growth in the past five years. So, there could be some other aspects that could potentially be preventing the company from growing. Such as, the company pays out a huge portion of its earnings as dividends, or is faced with competitive pressures.
首先,哥倫比亞戶外似乎有着令人尊敬的ROE。即使與行業平均水平13%相比,該公司的ROE看起來也相當不錯。在這種情況下,我們不禁想知道爲什麼在過去的五年中,哥倫比亞戶外幾乎沒有增長。因此,可能還有其他方面在阻礙公司的增長。例如,公司支付了其盈利的大部分作爲分紅派息,或者面臨競爭壓力。
We then compared Columbia Sportswear's net income growth with the industry and found that the company's growth figure is lower than the average industry growth rate of 22% in the same 5-year period, which is a bit concerning.
我們接着將哥倫比亞戶外的淨利潤增長與行業進行了比較,發現公司的增長數據低於同期行業平均增長率22%,這讓人有些擔憂。
Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. Doing so will help them establish if the stock's future looks promising or ominous. If you're wondering about Columbia Sportswear's's valuation, check out this gauge of its price-to-earnings ratio, as compared to its industry.
盈利增長是股票估值中的重要因素。 投資者接下來需要判斷的是,預期的盈利增長或其缺失是否已經包含在股票價格中。 這樣做將有助於他們確定股票的未來是光明還是暗淡。 如果你在考慮哥倫比亞戶外的估值,可以查看其與行業相比的市盈率指標。
Is Columbia Sportswear Using Its Retained Earnings Effectively?
哥倫比亞戶外是否有效利用了其留存收益?
Despite having a normal three-year median payout ratio of 25% (implying that the company keeps 75% of its income) over the last three years, Columbia Sportswear has seen a negligible amount of growth in earnings as we saw above. Therefore, there might be some other reasons to explain the lack in that respect. For example, the business could be in decline.
儘管過去三年的正常三年中位數派息比率爲25%(這意味着公司保留75%的收入),但正如我們上面所見,哥倫比亞戶外的盈利增長几乎可以忽略不計。因此,可能還有其他原因解釋這一缺乏。例如,該業務可能正在下滑。
Moreover, Columbia Sportswear has been paying dividends for at least ten years or more suggesting that management must have perceived that the shareholders prefer dividends over earnings growth. Based on the latest analysts' estimates, we found that the company's future payout ratio over the next three years is expected to hold steady at 29%. Regardless, the future ROE for Columbia Sportswear is predicted to rise to 17% despite there being not much change expected in its payout ratio.
此外,哥倫比亞戶外已經至少支付了十年的分紅,這表明管理層可能認爲股東更喜歡分紅而不是盈利增長。 根據最新的分析師估計,我們發現該公司未來三年的派息比率預計將穩定在29%。 不管怎樣,哥倫比亞戶外未來的ROE預計將上升到17%,儘管預計其派息比率不會有太大變化。
Summary
總結
Overall, we feel that Columbia Sportswear certainly does have some positive factors to consider. Yet, the low earnings growth is a bit concerning, especially given that the company has a high rate of return and is reinvesting ma huge portion of its profits. By the looks of it, there could be some other factors, not necessarily in control of the business, that's preventing growth. Having said that, looking at the current analyst estimates, we found that the company's earnings are expected to gain momentum. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.
總體而言,我們認爲哥倫比亞戶外確實有一些積極因素需要考慮。然而,低收益增長讓人有些擔憂,特別是考慮到該公司具有高回報率並且正在將大量利潤再投資。看來,還有一些其他因素,可能不在公司控制範圍內,這阻礙了增長。 話雖如此,查看當前分析師的預計,我們發現公司的收益預計將獲得動力。這些分析師的預期是基於行業的廣泛預期,還是基於公司的基本面?點擊這裏查看我們分析師爲該公司提供的預測頁面。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。