The Honest Company, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HNST) Institutional Investors Lost 14% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
The Honest Company, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HNST) Institutional Investors Lost 14% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Honest Company's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 顯著高的機構持股意味着Honest公司的股票價格對其交易活動敏感。
- 前25名股東持有47%的業務。
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
If you want to know who really controls The Honest Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:HNST), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制Honest Company, Inc.(納斯達克:HNST),那麼你需要查看它的股權登記情況。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有絕大部分的股份,持有44%的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大收益(或者在市場下跌時將損失最多)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$117m last week. However, the 151% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
機構投資者在公司市值上週下降了11700萬美元后,遭受了最高的損失。然而,給股東帶來的151%的年度回報可能緩和了這一打擊。然而,他們應當注意未來可能的進一步損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Honest Company.
在下圖中,我們關注Honest Company的不同所有權結構。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Honest Company?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Honest Company什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Honest Company does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Honest Company, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Honest Company確實有機構投資者,他們持有該公司相當一部分的股票。這表明在專業投資者中存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出不好的投資,和其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看Honest Company過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 7.6% of Honest Company. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Portolan Capital Management, LLC with 7.6% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.6% of common stock, and Jessica Warren holds about 5.3% of the company stock. Jessica Warren, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. In addition, we found that Carla Vernon, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
我們的數據表明,對沖基金持有誠實公司的7.6%。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能非常活躍且具有激進性。許多基金尋找中期催化劑來推動股票價格上漲。 通過我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是Portolan Capital Management, LLC,持有7.6%的流通股份。 貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有5.6%的普通股,Jessica Warren持有約5.3%的公司股票。 Jessica Warren是第三大股東,同時也是董事會成員。 此外,我們發現首席執行官Carla Vernon名下分配的股份爲0.5%。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Honest Company
誠實公司的內幕持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
We can see that insiders own shares in The Honest Company, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$702m, and insiders have US$68m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到內部人士持有誠實公司的股份。它的市值僅爲70200萬美元,內部人士名下持有6800萬美元的股份。這至少表明了一定程度的對齊。您可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in Honest Company. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有誠實公司38%的股份。雖然這一群體未必能夠決定大局,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Honest Company better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Honest Company that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解Honest Company,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們已經發現Honest Company有3個警告信號,在您投資之前應該引起注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。