With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Federated Hermes' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 高機構所有權意味着聯邦愛馬仕的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 共有13名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
- 內部人士最近已出售
Every investor in Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
聯邦愛馬仕公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:FHI)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構擁有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構可以獲得大量資本,因此其市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極的屬性。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Federated Hermes.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於聯邦愛馬仕的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federated Hermes?
關於聯邦愛馬仕,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。
Federated Hermes already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Federated Hermes' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
聯邦愛馬仕已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看聯邦愛馬仕的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Federated Hermes. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. With 11% and 7.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and FMR LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。對沖基金在聯邦愛馬仕的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有權爲11%。貝萊德公司和FMR LLC分別擁有11%和7.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記處,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前13名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Federated Hermes
聯邦愛馬仕的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Federated Hermes, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$142m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有聯邦愛馬仕公司的股份。內部人士持有價值1.42億美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Federated Hermes better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Federated Hermes that you should be aware of.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解聯邦愛馬仕,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了聯邦愛馬仕的一個警告標誌,你應該注意這一點。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。