Institutions Profited After Candel Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CADL) Market Cap Rose US$108m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most
Institutions Profited After Candel Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CADL) Market Cap Rose US$108m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Candel Therapeutics indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 50% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 散戶投資者對Candel Therapeutics的持股比例相當可觀,這表明他們在管理和業務策略上具有更大的發言權。
- 50%的業務由前22位股東持有。
- 內部人士最近一直在賣出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CADL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着Candel Therapeutics, Inc.(納斯達克:CADL),重要的是要理解該業務的所有權結構。持有最大份額的群體是散戶投資者,持有47%的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(如果出現下跌,則損失也最大)。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$150m last week, while institutions who own 18% also benefitted.
零售投資者在市值上週觸及15000萬美元后獲得了最多收益,而擁有18%的機構也受益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Candel Therapeutics.
在下面的圖表中,我們詳細分析Candel Therapeutics的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Candel Therapeutics?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Candel Therapeutics什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Candel Therapeutics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Candel Therapeutics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Candel Therapeutics已經有機構在其股份登記上。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好謹慎對待依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看Candel Therapeutics的營業歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Candel Therapeutics. Our data shows that Paul Manning is the largest shareholder with 7.2% of shares outstanding. Estuardo Aguilar-Cordova 2020 Irrevocable Trust is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and Laura K. Aguilar 2020 Irrevocable Trust holds about 6.2% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Paul-Peter Tak directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.
我們注意到對Candel Therapeutics的對沖基金投資並不顯著。我們的數據顯示,Paul Manning是最大的股東,持有7.2%的已發行股份。Estuardo Aguilar-Cordova 2020不可撤銷信託是第二大股東,持有6.4%的普通股,而Laura k. Aguilar 2020不可撤銷信託持有公司約6.2%的股份。此外,公司的CEO Paul-Peter Tak直接持有0.6%的總已發行股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 22 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地看我們的股權數字顯示,前22大股東的合計持股爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。該股票有一些分析師覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它仍然可能變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Candel Therapeutics
Candel Therapeutics的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Candel Therapeutics, Inc.. Insiders own US$24m worth of shares in the US$150m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有Candel Therapeutics, Inc.的合理比例。 內部人士擁有價值2400萬美元的股票,公司的市值爲15000萬美元。 看到內部人士如此投資於業務真是太好了。 可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有公司47%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。 儘管這種所有權比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 6.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私人股權公司持有6.0%的股份,能夠在以價值創造爲重點的企業戰略中發揮作用。有時候我們看到私人股權公司會長揸,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,正如名稱所示,他們很少投資於上市公司。經過一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並將資本重新部署到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 13%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有13%的已發行股份。這可能值得深入研究。如果相關方,例如內部人士,對這些私人公司有興趣,應該在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 7 warning signs for Candel Therapeutics (of which 4 are concerning!) you should know about.
我發現研究公司具體的所有權非常有趣。但要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如風險。每個公司都有這些風險,我們發現了7個關於Candel Therapeutics的警告信號(其中4個令人擔憂!)你應該了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。