Tennant (NYSE:TNC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Tennant (NYSE:TNC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Tennant Company (NYSE:TNC) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
傳奇基金經理李璐(查理·芒格支持的那位)曾說過:『最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性資本損失。』 所以看起來聰明的錢知道,債務——通常涉及破產——在評估一家公司的風險時是一個非常重要的因素。我們可以看到坦能公司(紐交所:TNC)在其業務中確實使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務帶來了多少風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時會變得危險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果一家企業無法償還其貸款人,那麼它就處於貸款人的控制之下。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們確實經常看到負債公司由於貸款人迫使他們以低價籌集資金而永久性地稀釋股東權益。當然,債務的好處在於,它通常代表着廉價資本,尤其是當它替代了能夠高效再投資的公司的稀釋時。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用時,我們首先會一起查看現金和債務。
How Much Debt Does Tennant Carry?
坦能公司擁有多少債務?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Tennant had US$209.3m of debt in September 2024, down from US$221.5m, one year before. On the flip side, it has US$91.4m in cash leading to net debt of about US$117.9m.
您可以點擊下方的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示,在2024年9月,坦能公司的債務爲20930萬美元,較一年前的22150萬美元有所下降。另一方面,它有9140萬美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲11790萬美元。
How Healthy Is Tennant's Balance Sheet?
坦能的資產負債表健康程度如何?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Tennant had liabilities of US$273.5m due within a year, and liabilities of US$294.1m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$91.4m and US$260.2m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$216.0m.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,坦能的負債爲27350萬美元,一年內到期的負債爲29410萬美元。另一方面,它有9140萬美元的現金和26020萬美元的應收款將於一年內到期。因此,它的負債比現金和(短期)應收款的總和多21600萬美元。
Given Tennant has a market capitalization of US$1.62b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
考慮到坦能的市值爲16.2億美元,令人難以相信這些負債構成了多大威脅。話雖如此,很明顯我們應該繼續關注它的資產負債表,以免情況惡化。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過看淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何輕鬆地覆蓋利息費用(利息覆蓋)來衡量一家公司相對於其獲利能力的債務負擔。這樣,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量,也考慮了其支付的利率。
Tennant has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.63. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 13.4 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On the other hand, Tennant saw its EBIT drop by 9.0% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Tennant can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
坦能的淨債務與EBITDA比率只有0.63,較低。而且它的EBIT輕鬆覆蓋了利息支出,達到其的13.4倍。因此你可以說,它所承受的債務威脅並不比大象受到老鼠的威脅多。然而,坦能在過去十二個月中其EBIT下降了9.0%。如果收益繼續以該速度下降,公司可能會愈加難以管理其債務負擔。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是一個重點。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定坦能能否隨着時間的推移增強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看行業專家的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Tennant recorded free cash flow of 41% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,儘管稅務機構可能很喜歡會計利潤,貸方只接受冷硬的現金。因此,我們總是檢查EBIT中有多少轉換爲自由現金流。查看最近三年的數據,坦能的自由現金流爲EBIT的41%,這比我們的預期要弱。這在償還債務方面並不理想。
Our View
我們的觀點
On our analysis Tennant's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For example, its EBIT growth rate makes us a little nervous about its debt. Considering this range of data points, we think Tennant is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. Of course, we wouldn't say no to the extra confidence that we'd gain if we knew that Tennant insiders have been buying shares: if you're on the same wavelength, you can find out if insiders are buying by clicking this link.
根據我們的分析,坦能的利息覆蓋率應該表明它在債務方面不會太麻煩。然而,我們的其他觀察並不是那麼令人振奮。例如,它的EBIT增長率讓我們對其債務感到有些緊張。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲坦能在管理債務水平方面處於良好位置。不過,負擔足夠沉重,因此我們建議所有股東密切關注。 當然,如果我們知道坦能的內部人士在買入股票,我們會更加有信心:如果你也有同樣的想法,可以點擊此鏈接查看內部人士是否在買入。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
最終,通常更好的是關注沒有淨負債的公司。你可以訪問我們特別列出這些公司的名單(所有公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。