Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as ACM Research, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ACMR) Recent US$61m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as ACM Research, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ACMR) Recent US$61m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies ACM Research's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insider ownership in ACM Research is 12%
- 顯著高的機構持有率意味着ACM Research的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 前15大股東持有該公司的51%。
- ACM Research的內部持股爲12%。
A look at the shareholders of ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 57% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看ACM Research, Inc.(納斯達克:ACMR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確來說約佔57%,是機構。換句話說,這個群體面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$61m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 12% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell ACM Research, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
結果是,機構投資者在上週承受了最高的損失,因爲市值下降了6100萬美元。最近的損失,加上股東一年來的12%的損失,可能讓這一群體的投資者感到不快。機構常被稱爲「市場推動者」,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面具有重要的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續,機構可能面臨出售ACM Research的壓力,這可能對個人投資者產生負面影響。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ACM Research.
讓我們更近一步看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於ACM Research的事情。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ACM Research?
機構所有權告訴我們關於ACM Research的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
ACM Research already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ACM Research's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
ACM Research已經在股東名冊上擁有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着這些機構的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們對此表示認可。但像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構共同擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競爭迅速出售股票。這在沒有增長曆史的公司中風險更高。您可以在下面看到ACM Research的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,背後總有更多的故事。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in ACM Research. The company's CEO Hui Wang is the largest shareholder with 9.1% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體施加重大影響力。對沖基金在ACM Research持有的股票不多。公司的首席執行官王輝是最大股東,持有9.1%的流通股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的7.1%和6.6%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到51%的股份由前15大股東控制,這意味着沒有任何單一股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of ACM Research
ACM Research的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of ACM Research, Inc.. Insiders have a US$123m stake in this US$988m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人持有ACM Research, Inc.的相當大比例股權。內部人對這個價值US$98800萬的企業持有US$12300萬的股份。看到內部人對業務如此投入,真是太好了。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ACM Research. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆持有25%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對ACM Research有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體不一定能決定一切,但他們確實可以對公司運行方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 5.4%, private equity firms could influence the ACM Research board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
憑藉5.4%的股份,股權投資公司可以影響ACM Research的董事會。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時能夠推動幫助市場看到公司價值的戰略。另一方面,這些持有人可能在公司上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with ACM Research .
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,您應該注意我們發現的ACM Research的兩個警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。