While Private Equity Firms Own 40% of SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 48% Ownership
While Private Equity Firms Own 40% of SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 48% Ownership
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over SATS by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
- Institutions own 12% of SATS
- 零售投資者對新翔集團的顯著控制意味着公衆在影響管理和治理相關決策方面擁有更多的權力
- 前20名股東持有50%的業務
- 機構持有新翔集團12%的股份
A look at the shareholders of SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一看新翔集團有限公司(新加坡交易所:S58)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到零售投資者在公司中擁有最大份額,達到48%的持股比例。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
And private equity firms on the other hand have a 40% ownership in the company.
另一方面,私募股權公司在該公司的擁有權爲40%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of SATS.
在下面的圖表中,我們詳細查看了新翔集團的不同股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SATS?
機構持股情況對新翔集團有何啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
SATS already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SATS, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
新翔集團的股東名冊上已經有機構。如果說他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明爲這些機構工作的分析師關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不是不常見的。因此,值得查看新翔集團以往的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in SATS. Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 2.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在新翔集團的股份不多。淡馬錫持倉(私有)有限公司目前是該公司最大股東,持有40%的流通股份。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約2.3%的流通股份,第三大股東也持有2.3%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地看我們的持股數據,前20大股東的總持股達50%,這意味着沒有單一股東持有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的一個好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現這一點。相當多的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長情況。
Insider Ownership Of SATS
SATS的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終需要向董事會負責。然而,管理者擔任執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內幕所有權表明領導者像真正的公司所有者那樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高內幕所有權也可能賦予公司內部小集團巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of SATS Ltd. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$18m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人士在新翔集團中以自己名義持有不足1%的股份。 這是一家大公司,因此即使是小比例的股權也能在董事會與股東之間建立一致性。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值1800萬新元的股份。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好的,但可能值得檢查一下那些內部人士是否在出售股票。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in SATS. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有新翔集團48%的股份。 雖然這一群體不一定能主導決策,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 40% stake in SATS. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股權公司持有新翔集團40%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可以發揮影響力。部分投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠推動一些策略,幫助市場看到公司的價值。另一方面,這些持有者可能在公司上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that SATS is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我覺得了解一家公司的真正擁有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,新翔集團在我們的投資分析中顯示出1個警告信號,您應該了解...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你和我一樣,可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是會縮減。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。