Here's Why United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Here's Why United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, United Natural Foods, Inc. (NYSE:UNFI) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過:『波動性遠非風險的同義詞。』 當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,通常會關注其債務的使用,因爲債務過重可能導致破產。 重要的是,聯合原生態食品公司(紐交所:UNFI)確實揹負着債務。 但這筆債務對股東來說是否構成了憂慮?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時會變得危險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還時才會成爲真正的問題,要麼通過籌集資金,要麼使用自身的現金流。 資本主義的一個基本部分是『創造性破壞』的過程,在這個過程中,失敗的企業會被他們的銀行家毫不留情地清算。 然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,企業必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久性稀釋股東,以此來穩住其資產負債表。 但是,通過替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資金以高回報率投資於增長的企業的極好工具。 在考慮一個企業使用多少債務時,首先要查看其現金和債務的總和。
What Is United Natural Foods's Debt?
聯合原生態食品的債務是多少?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that United Natural Foods had US$2.25b in debt in November 2024; about the same as the year before. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.
下方的圖表(您可以點擊以獲取更多詳細信息)顯示,聯合原生態食品在2024年11月的債務爲22.5億美金;與前一年差不多。 而且它並沒有多少現金,因此它的淨債務大致相同。
How Healthy Is United Natural Foods' Balance Sheet?
聯合原生態食品的資產負債表健康嗎?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that United Natural Foods had liabilities of US$2.53b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.81b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$37.0m and US$1.10b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$5.20b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
從最近的資產負債表來看,聯合原生態食品的短期負債爲25.3億美元,長期負債爲38.1億美元。另一方面,它有3700萬美元的現金和11億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多52億美元。
The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$1.48b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, United Natural Foods would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
這裏的缺口對這家14.8億美元的公司影響很大,就像一個小孩在承受一大揹包書籍、體育器材和小號的重負。所以我們毫無疑問地會密切關注它的資產負債表。最終,如果債權人要求償還,聯合原生態食品可能需要進行重大再融資。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要指標來告知我們債務水平與盈利的關係。第一個是淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,而第二個是其息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用(或其利息覆蓋,簡稱)。這種方法的優點在於我們考慮了債務的絕對數量(通過淨債務與EBITDA比率)和與該債務相關的實際利息費用(通過其利息覆蓋比率)。
While we wouldn't worry about United Natural Foods's net debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.4, we think its super-low interest cover of 1.2 times is a sign of high leverage. It seems that the business incurs large depreciation and amortisation charges, so maybe its debt load is heavier than it would first appear, since EBITDA is arguably a generous measure of earnings. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Looking on the bright side, United Natural Foods boosted its EBIT by a silky 92% in the last year. Like a mother's loving embrace of a newborn that sort of growth builds resilience, putting the company in a stronger position to manage its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine United Natural Foods's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
雖然我們不擔心聯合原生態食品的淨債務與EBITDA的比率爲4.4,但我們認爲其超低的利息保障倍數僅爲1.2次,這表明高槓杆。看起來該業務產生了大量的折舊和攤銷費用,因此其債務負擔可能比最初看起來要重,因爲EBITDA可以說是一個寬鬆的收益衡量標準。因此,股東應該意識到,利息費用似乎最近確實對業務產生了影響。積極的一面是,聯合原生態食品在去年將EBIT提高了92%。這種增長就像母親溫暖的懷抱,營造出一種韌性,使公司處於更強的地位來應對其債務。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是關注的重點。但未來的收益,尤其重要的,決定了聯合原生態食品今後維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,可能會覺得這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, United Natural Foods recorded free cash flow of 41% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,雖然稅務機關可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸方只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們顯然需要查看一下EBIT是否導致相應的自由現金流。查看最近三年,聯合原生態食品的自由現金流佔其EBIT的41%,這比我們預期的要弱。這在償還債務時並不好。
Our View
我們的觀點
On the face of it, United Natural Foods's interest cover left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at growing its EBIT; that's encouraging. Looking at the bigger picture, it seems clear to us that United Natural Foods's use of debt is creating risks for the company. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 2 warning signs with United Natural Foods (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
從表面上看,聯合原生態食品的利息覆蓋率讓我們對股票感到猶豫,而其總負債水平沒有比一年中最繁忙的夜晚裏一個空餐廳更吸引人。但至少它在增長EBIT方面表現得相當不錯;這是令人鼓舞的。從更大的方面看,我們清楚地看到聯合原生態食品的債務使用正在爲公司創造風險。如果一切順利,這應該會提升回報,但另一方面,債務提高了永久性資本損失的風險。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個顯而易見的起點。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠非如此。我們已經確定了聯合原生態食品的兩個警告信號(至少有一個不應被忽視),了解它們應該成爲您的投資過程的一部分。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果你有興趣投資那些能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增長利潤的企業,那麼請查看這份免費的、擁有淨現金的成長型企業名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。