share_log

OSI Systems (NASDAQ:OSIS) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

OSI Systems (NASDAQ:OSIS) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

OSI Systems (納斯達克:OSIS) 似乎合理地使用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  12/11 20:50

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that OSI Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:OSIS) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

由巴菲特的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李璐毫不掩飾地表示:『最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是您是否會遭受資本的永久損失。』 因此,當您考慮任何股票的風險時,考慮債務可能是顯而易見的,因爲過多的債務可能會使公司陷入困境。我們注意到,OSI Systems, Inc.(納斯達克:OSIS)在其資產負債表上確實有債務。但股東是否應該擔心其債務使用?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還時才是真正的問題,要麼通過籌集資金,要麼通過自身的現金流。資本主義的一個組成部分是『創造性破壞』的過程,失敗的企業往往會被他們的銀行家無情地清算。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們常常看到負債公司永久性地稀釋股東權益,因爲貸款方迫使他們以低迷的價格籌集資金。然而,通過替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資於增長的企業的一個極好工具。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要查看其現金和債務的總和。

What Is OSI Systems's Debt?

OSI Systems的債務是多少?

As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, OSI Systems had US$735.3m of debt, up from US$377.9m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had US$85.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$650.2m.

如您在下面所見,截至2024年9月底,OSI Systems的債務爲73530萬美元,較一年前的37790萬美元有所增加。點擊圖片以獲取更多詳細信息。然而,它也有8510萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲65020萬美元。

big
NasdaqGS:OSIS Debt to Equity History December 11th 2024
納斯達克:OSIS債務與股本歷史 2024年12月11日

How Strong Is OSI Systems' Balance Sheet?

OSI Systems的資產負債表有多強?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that OSI Systems had liabilities of US$712.5m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$614.5m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$85.1m as well as receivables valued at US$687.6m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$554.4m.

仔細查看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到OSI Systems在12個月內有71250萬美元的負債,以及61450萬美元的長期負債。抵消這些義務,它有8510萬美元的現金以及在12個月內到期的價值68760萬美元的應收款。因此,它的負債超過了現金和(短期)應收款的總和55440萬美元。

Of course, OSI Systems has a market capitalization of US$3.06b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

當然,OSI Systems的市值爲30.6億美元,因此這些負債可能是可控的。話雖如此,顯然我們應該繼續關注其資產負債表,以免情況變得更糟。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過查看公司的淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及計算息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息費用的能力(利息保障率),來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力的情況。這種方法的優勢在於,我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(通過淨債務與EBITDA的比率)和與該債務相關的實際利息費用(通過其利息保障率)。

OSI Systems has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.7 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 6.7 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Importantly, OSI Systems grew its EBIT by 35% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if OSI Systems can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

OSI Systems的債務與EBITDA比率爲2.7,其EBIT覆蓋利息支出6.7倍。綜合來看,這意味着,儘管我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以處理當前的槓桿。重要的是,OSI Systems在過去十二個月裏將EBIT增長了35%,這樣的增長將使其更容易處理債務。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是關注的重點。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定OSI Systems是否能夠隨着時間的推移增強資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Considering the last three years, OSI Systems actually recorded a cash outflow, overall. Debt is usually more expensive, and almost always more risky in the hands of a company with negative free cash flow. Shareholders ought to hope for an improvement.

但我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司不能用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷冰冰的現金。因此,查看EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持的很重要。考慮過去三年,OSI Systems實際上錄得了整體現金流出。在自由現金流爲負的公司的手中,債務通常更貴,幾乎總是更具風險。股東應該希望有所改善。

Our View

我們的觀點

On our analysis OSI Systems's EBIT growth rate should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. In particular, conversion of EBIT to free cash flow gives us cold feet. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about OSI Systems's use of debt. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for OSI Systems you should be aware of, and 2 of them are potentially serious.

根據我們的分析,OSI Systems的EBIT增長率應表明它在債務方面不會遇到太多麻煩。但我們上面提到的其他因素並不那麼令人鼓舞。 尤其是EBIT轉換爲自由現金流讓我們感到不安。 當我們考慮上述所有因素時,我們確實對OSI Systems的債務使用感到有些謹慎。雖然我們欣賞債務可以提升股本回報,但我們建議股東密切關注其債務水平,以免增加。 在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但最終,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。 舉個例子:我們發現了OSI Systems的3個警示信號,你應該注意其中的2個可能是嚴重的。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論