WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies WD-40 Company (NASDAQ:WDFC) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
霍華德·馬克斯說得很好,他提到,與其擔心股票價格的波動,'我擔心的是永久性損失的可能性...而我認識的每個實用投資者也都有這樣的擔憂。' 當我們考慮一家公司有多風險時,我們總是喜歡查看其債務的使用情況,因爲債務過重可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,WD-40公司(納斯達克:WDFC)也使用債務。但是這項債務對股東來說是個問題嗎?
When Is Debt A Problem?
何時債務成爲問題?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
一般來說,只有當一家公司不能輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過融資還是靠自身的現金流。如果情況真的很糟糕,貸款人可能會控制業務。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情形是,該公司不得不以低價籌集新股權資本,從而永久性稀釋股東權益。雖然如此,最常見的情況是公司合理管理其債務,並使之對自身有利。當我們考慮一家公司對債務的使用時,首先要查看現金和債務的整體情況。
How Much Debt Does WD-40 Carry?
WD-40的債務有多少?
As you can see below, WD-40 had US$94.6m of debt at August 2024, down from US$120.5m a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$46.7m, its net debt is less, at about US$47.9m.
正如您在下面看到的,WD-40在2024年8月的債務爲9460萬美元,低於一年前的12050萬美元。然而,由於它的現金儲備爲4670萬美元,其淨債務更低,約爲4790萬美元。
How Strong Is WD-40's Balance Sheet?
WD-40的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that WD-40 had liabilities of US$103.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$115.0m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$46.7m and US$118.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$53.8m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
從最近的資產負債表可以看出,WD-40的負債爲10350萬美元,需在一年內到期,且11500萬美元的負債在之後到期。另一方面,它有4670萬美元的現金和11800萬美元的應收賬款在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總共比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出5380萬美元。
This state of affairs indicates that WD-40's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So it's very unlikely that the US$3.71b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet. Carrying virtually no net debt, WD-40 has a very light debt load indeed.
這種狀況表明,WD-40的資產負債表看起來相當穩健,因爲其總負債恰好與流動資產相等。因此,這家37.1億美元的公司不太可能出現現金短缺,但仍然值得關注資產負債表。WD-40幾乎沒有淨債務,確實負擔很輕。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。
WD-40 has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.45. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 25.3 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. The good news is that WD-40 has increased its EBIT by 7.4% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if WD-40 can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
WD-40的淨債務與EBITDA的比率僅爲0.45。而其EBIT能夠覆蓋利息支出多達25.3倍。因此我們對其超保守的債務使用感到相當輕鬆。好消息是WD-40在過去12個月中將EBIT提高了7.4%,這應該會緩解對債務償還的顧慮。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的地方。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定WD-40能否隨着時間的推移而增強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告會很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, WD-40 produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 64% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
但我們的最終考慮也是重要的,因爲公司不能僅用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要現金。因此,檢查一下EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的,值得關注。在過去的三年裏,WD-40產生了強勁的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的64%,大致符合我們的預期。這種自由現金流使公司在適當的時候有良好的能力償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, WD-40's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think WD-40's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - WD-40 has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
高興的是,WD-40令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋率意味着它在債務方面佔據優勢。好消息還不止於此,因爲它的淨債務與EBITDA的比率也支持這一觀點!從更大的角度來看,我們認爲WD-40的債務使用似乎相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。畢竟,合理的槓桿可以提高股本收益。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個明顯的起點。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠非如此。例如——WD-40有1個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。