Newmont Corporation (NYSE:NEM) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 74%
Newmont Corporation (NYSE:NEM) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 74%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Newmont implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 24 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have bought recently
- 機構在紐曼礦業的重大持股意味着他們對公司股票價格有重要影響。
- 前24大股東擁有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人士最近進行了買入。
Every investor in Newmont Corporation (NYSE:NEM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位紐曼礦業公司(紐交所代碼:NEM)的投資者都應該了解最有影響力的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構在公司中佔據了74%的股份,這意味着如果股價上漲,他們將受益最多(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有龐大的資金和研究能力,因此機構持股往往具有重要影響力,尤其是在個人投資者中。因此,投入一家公司大量資金的機構通常被視爲積極屬性。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Newmont.
讓我們更深入地了解不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於紐曼礦業的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Newmont?
機構所有權對紐曼礦業有何暗示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Newmont already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Newmont's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
紐曼礦業的股份登記上已經有機構存在。實際上,他們在公司中持有相當可觀的股份。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,和其他人一樣。當多個機構共同持有某隻股票時,總是存在着他們處於'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭迅速賣出股票。這個風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到紐曼礦業的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是還有更多的故事。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Newmont. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 4.3% of the stock.
機構投資者持有超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在紐曼礦業的股份不多。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,擁有12%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約11%和4.3%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前24位股東控制,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有大多數所有權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構持股情況可以爲您的研究增值,研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,有助於深入了解股票的預期表現。目前有合理數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Newmont
紐曼礦業的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終需要向董事會負責。然而,管理者擔任執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部人持股是一種積極的現象,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的利益高度一致。然而,在某些情況下,這個群體內的權力可能過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Newmont Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$54m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有紐曼礦業不到1%的股份。由於公司規模如此之大,我們並不期望內部人士擁有大量的股票。整體上,他們擁有價值5400萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Newmont. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有25%股份的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在紐曼礦業上具有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體未必可以決定一切,但確實能對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Newmont .
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體是很重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在紐曼礦業發現的1個警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。