CureVac N.V.'s (NASDAQ:CVAC) Largest Shareholders Are Individual Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$101m Last Week
CureVac N.V.'s (NASDAQ:CVAC) Largest Shareholders Are Individual Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$101m Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over CureVac by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 3 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Institutions own 18% of CureVac
- 個人投資者對CureVac的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更大的影響力
- 前3大股東擁有公司52%的股份
- 機構擁有CureVac 18%的股份
If you want to know who really controls CureVac N.V. (NASDAQ:CVAC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制CureVac N.V.(納斯達克:CVAC),那麼你需要查看其股份登記冊的構成。我們可以看到個人投資者在公司中擁有37%的股份。換句話說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最多(或者在市場下行時損失最多)。
As a result, individual investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 15% gain.
因此,散戶投資者是上週15%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CureVac.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於CureVac的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CureVac?
機構持股情況告訴我們關於CureVac什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CureVac. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CureVac's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如你所見,機構投資者在CureVac中擁有相當的股份。這在專業投資者中意味着某種可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人都一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得關注CureVac的營業收入歷史。 當然,未來才是最重要的。
CureVac is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is dievini Hopp BioTech holding GmbH & Co. KG, with ownership of 31%. With 13% and 7.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, KfW, Asset Management Arm and GSK plc are the second and third largest shareholders.
CureVac並不被對沖基金持有。公司的最大股東是dievini Hopp BioTech holding GmbH,持股31%。KfW、資產管理部門和GSk plc分別持有13%和7.4%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究顯示,前三大股東通過他們52%的股份在公司中擁有相當數量的所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。覆蓋該股票的分析師數量相對合理,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有幫助。
Insider Ownership Of CureVac
CureVac的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然對內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部人持股是一種積極的現象,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的利益高度一致。然而,在某些情況下,這個群體內的權力可能過於集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in CureVac N.V.. It has a market capitalization of just US$695m, and insiders have US$43m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到內部人擁有CureVac N.V.的股份。它的市值僅爲69500萬美元,內部人名下持有價值4300萬美元的股份。有人會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人是否有在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in CureVac. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有CureVac 37%的股份。儘管這個持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 31% stake in CureVac. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股權投資公司持有CureVac 31%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。部分投資者可能對此感到振奮,因爲股權投資有時能夠推動策略,幫助市場看到公司的價值。或者,這些持有人可能在公司上市後退出投資。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 7.4% of the CureVac shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有CureVac發行股份的7.4%。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性股份。這些企業可能是相似的,或者一起合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for CureVac you should be aware of.
我發現研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如:我們發現了CureVac的一個警告信號,您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於該公司的分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。