Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANGO) With 74% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANGO) With 74% Ownership
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies AngioDynamics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 显著的高比例机构持股意味着AngioDynamics的股价对他们的交易行为敏感。
- 前13大股东持有该业务的51%。
- 近期内部人士的购买。
Every investor in AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANGO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位投资者在AngioDynamics, Inc.(纳斯达克:ANGO)中都应该了解最强大的股东群体。机构持有74%的股份,是公司最大股东。换句话说,该集团在投资公司的过程中将获得最大的利益(或面临最大的损失)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$284m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 25%.
上周,机构投资者在公司市值达到28400万美金时,最终获得了最大的收益。上周的收益将进一步提升当前股东的年度回报率,目前为25%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of AngioDynamics, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解AngioDynamics的每种所有者类型,首先是下面的图表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AngioDynamics?
机构持股对AngioDynamics的启示是什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
We can see that AngioDynamics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AngioDynamics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到AngioDynamics确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这暗示这些机构的分析师已经关注了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但是,就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下AngioDynamics的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It looks like hedge funds own 5.5% of AngioDynamics shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.9% and 5.6% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO James Clemmer is the owner of 1.2% of the company's shares.
投资者应该注意,机构其实拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们能 collectively 拥有显著的权力。看起来对冲基金拥有 AngioDynamics 5.5%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变化。贝莱德目前是最大股东,拥有11%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有大约5.9%和5.6%的股票。此外,首席执行官詹姆斯·克莱默拥有公司1.2%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记,我们可以看到前13大股东控制了51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of AngioDynamics
AngioDynamics 的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
尽管内部人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层对董事会负责,而后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内幕所有权表明领导者像真正的公司所有者那样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高内幕所有权也可能赋予公司内部小集团巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in AngioDynamics, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$9.6m worth of the US$284m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
股东们可能会有兴趣了解,内部人士在AngioDynamics, Inc.持有股份。作为个人,内部人士总共拥有价值960万美元的股份,公司的市值为28400万美元。这至少显示出一定程度的共识。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AngioDynamics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众股东持有17%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对AngioDynamics有一定的影响力。尽管这种持股规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以在公司政策上产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得研究到底是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史。您也可以通过访问这张免费图表,查看历史营业收入和收益的详细图形。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。
译文内容由第三方软件翻译。