Based On Its ROE, Is Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:SRPT) A High Quality Stock?
Based On Its ROE, Is Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:SRPT) A High Quality Stock?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:SRPT).
許多投資者仍在學習在分析股票時可能有用的各種指標。本文適合那些想要了解股本回報率(ROE)的人。爲了讓課程具有實用性,我們將使用ROE來更好地理解Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (納斯達克:SRPT)。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
ROE或股本回報率是評估公司如何有效地爲其股東所投資的資金創造回報的有用工具。簡單來說,它衡量公司的盈利能力相對於股東權益的比例。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for return on equity is:
股東權益回報率的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Sarepta Therapeutics is:
因此,根據上述公式,Sarepta Therapeutics的ROE爲:
10.0% = US$122m ÷ US$1.2b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
10.0% = US$12200萬 ÷ US$12億(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.10 in profit.
'回報'是過去十二個月的利潤。這意味着對於每$1的股東權益,該公司產生了$0.10的利潤。
Does Sarepta Therapeutics Have A Good ROE?
Sarepta Therapeutics的ROE好嗎?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, Sarepta Therapeutics has a lower ROE than the average (18%) in the Biotechs industry classification.
判斷一個公司的回報率是否良好的簡單方法是將其與行業的平均水平進行比較。重要的是,這遠不是一種完美的衡量標準,因爲同一行業分類中的公司差異顯著。正如下方圖形所示,Sarepta Therapeutics的ROE低於生物技術行業分類的平均水平(18%)。
That's not what we like to see. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A company with high debt levels and low ROE is a combination we like to avoid given the risk involved. You can see the 2 risks we have identified for Sarepta Therapeutics by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.
這並不是我們希望看到的。然而,低ROE並不總是壞事。如果公司的債務水平適中或較低,那麼仍然有機會通過財務槓桿來改善回報。我們喜歡避免具有高債務水平和低ROE的公司,因爲涉及的風險。您可以通過訪問我們平台上的風險儀表板,免費查看我們爲Sarepta Therapeutics識別的兩個風險。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
債務如何影響ROE?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金來投資業務,以增加利潤。投資的現金來源可以是前一年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股份或借款。在前兩種情況下,ROE將反映這種現金的使用以實現增長。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總權益。這將使ROE看起來比不使用債務時更好。
Sarepta Therapeutics' Debt And Its 10.0% ROE
Sarepta Therapeutics的債務及其10.0%的ROE
Sarepta Therapeutics clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.01. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.
Sarepta Therapeutics顯然使用大量債務來提高回報,因爲其債務股本比率爲1.01。由於ROE相對較低,且債務使用顯著,目前很難對這個業務感到興奮。債務確實帶來了額外的風險,因此只有在公司從中獲得一定的良好回報時,它才真正值得。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股東權益回報率對於比較不同企業的質量是有用的。能夠在不借太多債務的情況下實現高股東權益回報率的公司通常質量較好。如果兩家公司有相同的ROE,我通常會更傾向於選擇債務較少的那家。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是,ROE只是整個拼圖的一部分,因爲高質量的企業通常在高盈利倍數下交易。考慮其他因素,比如未來的利潤增長和未來需要多少投資也是很重要的。因此,您可能想看看這個數據豐富的公司預測交互圖表。
Of course Sarepta Therapeutics may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.
當然,Sarepta Therapeutics可能不是最好的買入股票。所以您可能希望查看這個免費集合,裏面有其他具有高ROE和低債務的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。