share_log

Topgolf Callaway Brands (NYSE:MODG Investor Three-year Losses Grow to 71% as the Stock Sheds US$74m This Past Week

Topgolf Callaway Brands (NYSE:MODG Investor Three-year Losses Grow to 71% as the Stock Sheds US$74m This Past Week

Topgolf Callaway品牌(紐交所:MODG)的投資者在過去一週損失了71%,股價下跌了7400萬美元
Simply Wall St ·  12/07 22:37

As an investor, mistakes are inevitable. But really big losses can really drag down an overall portfolio. So take a moment to sympathize with the long term shareholders of Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (NYSE:MODG), who have seen the share price tank a massive 71% over a three year period. That would be a disturbing experience. The more recent news is of little comfort, with the share price down 38% in a year. Furthermore, it's down 21% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders. This could be related to the recent financial results - you can catch up on the most recent data by reading our company report.

作爲投資者,錯誤是不可避免的。但真正大的損失可能會嚴重拖累整體投資組合。因此,讓我們花一點時間來同情Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.(紐交所:MODG)的長期股東,他們在三年期間目睹了股價暴跌71%。這將是一個令人不安的經歷。最近的資訊並沒有帶來太多安慰,股價在一年內下跌了38%。此外,約一個季度內下降了21%。對持有者而言,這並不有趣。這可能與最近的財務業績有關——您可以通過閱讀我們的公司報告來了解最近的數據。

Since Topgolf Callaway Brands has shed US$74m from its value in the past 7 days, let's see if the longer term decline has been driven by the business' economics.

由於Topgolf Callaway Brands在過去7天內損失了7400萬美元,讓我們看看長期的下滑是否是由業務經濟因素驅動的。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章《格雷厄姆-多德斯維爾的超級投資人》中,禾倫·巴菲特描述了股票價格並不總是理性地反映公司價值的情況。一種有缺陷但合理的評估公司情緒如何變化的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股票價格進行比較。

Topgolf Callaway Brands saw its share price decline over the three years in which its EPS also dropped, falling to a loss. Due to the loss, it's not easy to use EPS as a reliable guide to the business. However, we can say we'd expect to see a falling share price in this scenario.

在過去三年中,Topgolf Callaway Brands的股價下降,而其每股收益也下降,導致出現虧損。由於虧損,因此很難將每股收益作爲業務的可靠指導。然而,我們可以說在這種情況下,我們預計將看到股價下跌。

You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

您可以在下面的圖片中查看每股收益如何隨時間變化(單擊圖表以查看確切的價值)。

big
NYSE:MODG Earnings Per Share Growth December 7th 2024
紐交所:MODG 每股收益增長 2024年12月7日

This free interactive report on Topgolf Callaway Brands' earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.

這份關於Topgolf Callaway Brands的收益、營業收入和現金流的免費互動報告是一個很好的起點,如果你想進一步研究這隻股票。

A Different Perspective

另一種看法

Investors in Topgolf Callaway Brands had a tough year, with a total loss of 38%, against a market gain of about 34%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 10% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. If you would like to research Topgolf Callaway Brands in more detail then you might want to take a look at whether insiders have been buying or selling shares in the company.

Topgolf Callaway Brands的投資者經歷了艱難的一年,總體損失爲38%,而市場的收益約爲34%。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但在我們過於關注之前,我們希望看到業務基本指標的改善。遺憾的是,去年的表現在五年裏給股東帶來了每年10%的總損失,整體表現不佳。從一般情況來看,長期股價疲軟可能是一個壞兆頭,儘管逆向投資者可能希望研究這隻股票,希望能夠迎來翻身。如果您想更詳細地研究Topgolf Callaway Brands,您可能想看看內部人士是否在買入或賣出公司的股票。

Of course Topgolf Callaway Brands may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

當然,Topgolf Callaway Brands可能不是最值得買入的股票。所以您可能希望查看這份免費的增長股票集合。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論