share_log

Return Trends At Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) Aren't Appealing

Return Trends At Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) Aren't Appealing

紐交所UA公司的股票走勢不夠吸引人
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/05 02:56

There are a few key trends to look for if we want to identify the next multi-bagger. Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.

如果我們想識別下一個多倍收益股,有幾個關鍵趨勢需要關注。首先,我們希望能夠識別出資本回報率(ROCE)的增長,以及不斷增加的資本基礎。如果你看到這些,通常意味着這是一家擁有良好業務模型和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。考慮到這一點,當我們查看安德瑪(紐交所:UAA)及其ROCE趨勢時,並沒有感到特別興奮。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Under Armour is:

對於那些不知情的人來說,ROCE是指公司的年稅前利潤(其回報)相對於業務中所投入的資本。計算安德瑪的公式爲:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)

0.067 = US$221m ÷ (US$4.5b - US$1.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

0.067 = 22100萬美元 ÷ (45億 - 12億美元)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月數據)。

So, Under Armour has an ROCE of 6.7%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Luxury industry average of 13%.

因此,安德瑪的ROCE爲6.7%。在絕對數字上,這個回報較低,也低於奢侈品行業的平均水平13%。

big
NYSE:UAA Return on Capital Employed December 4th 2024
紐交所:UAA 資本回報率 2024年12月4日

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Under Armour compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Under Armour for free.

從上面可以看到,安德瑪目前的資本回報率與其之前的資本回報率相比,但過去能夠告訴我們的也有限。如果你願意,可以免費查看覆蓋安德瑪的分析師的預測。

So How Is Under Armour's ROCE Trending?

那麼安德瑪的資本回報率趨勢如何?

Over the past five years, Under Armour's ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So unless we see a substantial change at Under Armour in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.

在過去五年中,安德瑪的資本回報率和所用資本基本保持穩定。這種特徵的業務往往是成熟和穩定的,因爲它們已經過了增長階段。因此,除非我們看到安德瑪在資本回報率和額外投資方面有實質性的變化,否則我們不會指望它會成爲多倍收益股。

What We Can Learn From Under Armour's ROCE

我們能從安德瑪的資本回報率中學到什麼

In a nutshell, Under Armour has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. And in the last five years, the stock has given away 47% so the market doesn't look too hopeful on these trends strengthening any time soon. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.

簡而言之,安德瑪在過去五年中一直在以相同的資本回報相同的回報而緩慢前行。在過去五年中,股票跌幅達47%,因此市場對這些趨勢近期加強的前景並不樂觀。總的來說,內在趨勢並不符合多倍收益股的特徵,因此如果這是你所追求的,我們認爲你可能會在其他地方更幸運。

If you want to continue researching Under Armour, you might be interested to know about the 1 warning sign that our analysis has discovered.

如果你想繼續研究安德瑪,你可能會對我們的分析發現的一個警示信號感興趣。

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

對於喜歡投資穩健公司的人,請查看這份具有穩健資產負債表和高權益回報的公司免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論