With 71% Ownership, Arista Networks, Inc. (NYSE:ANET) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 71% Ownership, Arista Networks, Inc. (NYSE:ANET) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Arista Networks' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Insiders own 18% of Arista Networks
- 由於機構在股票中持有大額股份,arista networks的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前12個股東持有業務的51%。
- 內部人持有arista networks 18%的股份。
If you want to know who really controls Arista Networks, Inc. (NYSE:ANET), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 71% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了arista networks, Inc.(紐交所:ANET),那麼你需要查看其股權登記的構成。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔71%,是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或在出現下跌時損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Arista Networks, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討arista networks的每種所有者類型,首先看下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arista Networks?
機構持股對Arista Networks意味着什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Arista Networks already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Arista Networks, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
arista networks的股票註冊中已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司中持有相當可觀的股份。這暗示着爲這些機構工作的分析師對這隻股票進行了研究,並且他們看好它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,那麼其股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看arista networks的歷史收益軌跡(見下文)是值得的。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Arista Networks. Our data suggests that Andreas Bechtolsheim, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 15%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 6.7% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Jayshree Ullal is the owner of 3.0% of the company's shares.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在arista networks中持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,公司首席執行官Andreas Bechtolsheim是持股最多的股東,持有15%的股份。當內部人士持有公司相當數量的股票時,投資者將其視爲一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人士願意將他們的財富與公司未來捆綁在一起。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約7.5%和6.7%的股票。此外,首席執行官Jayshree Ullal持有公司3.0%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
看一下股東註冊表,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Arista Networks
Arista Networks的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Arista Networks, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$23b stake in this US$129b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
看起來內幕人員擁有arista networks, inc.的一部分股份。很有趣的是,內幕人員在這家價值1290億美元的公司中擁有230億美元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會和他們一起投資。您可能希望查看這張免費圖表,展示內幕人員最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Arista Networks. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆擁有11%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對arista networks有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個股權的規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Arista Networks better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得考慮擁有一家公司的股份的不同群體。但要更好地理解arista networks,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。