Recent Uptick Might Appease The Hershey Company (NYSE:HSY) Institutional Owners After Losing 1.7% Over the Past Year
Recent Uptick Might Appease The Hershey Company (NYSE:HSY) Institutional Owners After Losing 1.7% Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Hershey's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 5 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 考慮到機構在股票中所佔的大比例,好時的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 前五大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
A look at the shareholders of The Hershey Company (NYSE:HSY) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 89% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下好時公司(紐交所:HSY)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司89%的所有權。換句話說,這個群體最有可能(或最有可能)從他們對該公司的投資中獲利或損失。
After a year of 1.7% losses, last week's 3.6% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.
經過一年1.7%的虧損,上週的3.6%的增長將受到機構投資者的歡迎,因爲這可能是回報開始向更高趨勢發展的一個跡象。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hershey.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關好時的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hershey?
機構持股對好時告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Hershey does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hershey's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到好時確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。 這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。 他們有時也會出錯。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。 因此,值得查看好時的下面收入歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hershey is not owned by hedge funds. Milton Hershey School Trust is currently the largest shareholder, with 28% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.6% and 6.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上持有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要影響力。好時不是由對沖基金持有。米爾頓·赫歇學校信託目前是最大的股東,持有流通股的28%。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的9.6%和6.1%。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了一個事實,即約52%的公司由前5名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Hershey
好時的內部股權情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of The Hershey Company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$73m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
根據我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有好時公司不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模如此之大,我們不希望內部人士擁有大量股票。總體而言,他們共擁有7300萬美元的股票。看到至少有些內部人士持有股份總是件好事,但值得注意的是他們是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Hershey. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有好時公司10%的股份。儘管擁有的股份比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不協調,可能無法改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Hershey you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是很值得的,但有一些更重要的因素。一個例子是:我們發現好時有一個警告標誌,你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。