share_log

John Coustas Danaos Corporation's (NYSE:DAC) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 3.5%last Week

John Coustas Danaos Corporation's (NYSE:DAC) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 3.5%last Week

约翰·库斯塔斯达那俄斯公司(纽约交易所:DAC)的CEO是最看好的内部人士,他们的股票价值上周增长了3.5%
Simply Wall St ·  12/04 18:42

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Danaos' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 2 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Institutions own 21% of Danaos
  • 达那俄斯的显着内部持股表明对公司扩张具有固有利益
  • 前2名股东拥有该公司的52%。
  • 机构拥有达那俄斯21%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Danaos Corporation (NYSE:DAC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解谁真正控制达那俄斯公司(纽交所:DAC),那么您将不得不查看其股东登记册的构成。持有该公司最多股份的群体,准确地说约占50%,是个人内部持股者。换句话说,该群体对其投资进入公司可能获得最多(或者损失最多)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$54m last week.

显然,在上周公司市值上涨5400万美元后,内部人士受益最多。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Danaos.

让我们仔细看看各种类型的股东对达那俄斯有什么可以告诉我们的。

big
NYSE:DAC Ownership Breakdown December 4th 2024
纽交所:DAC所有权分布于2024年12月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Danaos?

机构持有权重告诉我们有关达那俄斯的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Danaos does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Danaos, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,达那俄斯确实有机构投资者; 他们持有公司的股份相当大的一部分。 这可能表明公司在投资社区中享有一定程度的信誉。 但是,最好要警惕依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。 他们也会有失误。 如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,往往会看到股价大幅下跌。 因此,值得检查达那俄斯的过去收益轨迹(下文)。 当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。

big
NYSE:DAC Earnings and Revenue Growth December 4th 2024
纽交所:DAC 营收增长和2024年12月4日收入增长

Danaos is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO John Coustas is the largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. Acadian Asset Management LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 3.4% of common stock, and RBF Capital LLC holds about 2.2% of the company stock.

达那俄斯不是被对冲基金持有。该公司首席执行官约翰·库斯塔斯拥有48%的流通股,是最大的股东。Acadian Asset Management LLC是第二大股东,持有3.4%的普通股,RBF Capital LLC持有约2.2%的公司股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Danaos

达那俄斯的内部持股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Danaos Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.6b, and insiders have US$771m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

根据我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有达那俄斯公司相当比例的股份。该公司的市值仅为16亿美元,内部人士名下拥有77100万美元的股份。这是相当显著的。大多数人会说,这显示了与股东的良好契合程度,尤其是在这样规模的公司中。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Danaos. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在达那俄斯持有30%的股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决定偏向他们,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Danaos (of which 2 can't be ignored!) you should know about.

尽管考虑到拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。就像风险一样。每家公司都存在风险,我们已发现达那俄斯存在3个警示信号(其中2个是不可忽视的!)你应该知道的。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发