Supreme Court Hears Case Against FDA Ban On Flavored Vapes: Here Are The Stocks To Watch
Supreme Court Hears Case Against FDA Ban On Flavored Vapes: Here Are The Stocks To Watch
The U.S. Supreme Court heard a challenge against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Monday about past bans on flavored liquids for e-cigarettes and vapes.
美國最高法院週一聽取了針對食品和藥物管理局(FDA)過去對電子煙和蒸汽飲料中的調味液實行禁令的挑戰。
What Happened: Triton Distribution brought a case to the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging the law that allows the FDA to control the regulation of e-liquids and e-cigarettes.
發生了什麼事:Triton Distribution向美國最高法院提起訴訟,挑戰允許FDA控制電子煙液和電子煙管制的法律。
The FDA previously denied Triton's applications to sell flavored e-cigarettes. The concern is that they could appeal to children and teenagers, as reported by Politico.
FDA此前拒絕了Triton銷售調味電子煙的申請。擔憂是他們可能吸引孩子和青少年,據Politico報道。
Cigarette flavors, except menthol, have been banned by the FDA since 2009.
自2009年以來,除薄荷外,菸草味道已被FDA禁止。
A final ruling will not be made by the Supreme Court for months. Justices, though, don't appear to sympathize with Triton's argument.
最高法院將在幾個月後做出最終裁決。儘管如此,法官們似乎並不同情Triton的論點。
"Everybody basically knows that flavors are particularly dangerous in terms of kids starting the use of smoking products," Justice Elena Kagan said.
「基本上所有人都知道,從味道開始對孩子嘗試吸菸產品特別危險。」法官埃琳娜·卡根說。
Triton has the potential to reapply with the FDA. A company attorney said the incoming Donald Trump administration could make things easier, given his past comments on wanting to save vaping.
Triton有可能重新向FDA申請。一位公司律師表示,即將到來的唐納德·特朗普政府可能會使事情變得更容易,考慮到他此前有關想要拯救電子煙的言論。
Some judges believed the FDA was not consistent on its approval process.
一些法官認爲FDA在其批准流程上不一致。
"Their argument is that the guidance were actually a moving target, that either they weren't clear, or you changed the guidance as time went on," Justice Clarence Thomas said.
克萊倫斯·托馬斯大法官表示:「他們的論點是,這些指導實際上是一個不斷變化的目標,要麼他們並不清晰,要麼您隨着時間的推移改變了指導。」
Read Also: Trump Vows To 'Save Vaping Again' Despite Past Partial Ban. Here's How He Plans To Do It
閱讀更多:特朗普誓言「再次拯救吸菸」,儘管過去曾部分禁止。他計劃如何實現
Why It's Important: Under the existing 2009 law, the FDA only approves new tobacco products if they believe they will protect public health. This makes it harder to get new products approved, as the system favors those fighting to get current users of products to stop smoking or prevent new users from starting.
爲何重要:根據現有的2009年法律,只有在FDA相信新的菸草產品能夠保護公共健康的情況下,才會批准新的菸草產品。這使得獲得新產品批准變得更加困難,因爲該系統偏向於那些努力使當前產品用戶戒菸或阻止新用戶開始吸菸的人。
Past appeals courts have approved the FDA's decisions, as reported by NPR. The conservative Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the FDA's decision capabilities. It also threatened to allow all vaping products to hit the market, prompting the challenge with the Supreme Court.
據NPR報道,過去的上訴法院已經批准了FDA的決定。保守派的第五巡迴法院駁回了FDA的決策能力。它還威脅要讓所有霧化產品進入市場,促使最高法院對此發起挑戰。
With a final ruling likely in June, cigarette and vaping companies could be on the radar of investors.
可能在六月做出最終裁決,捲菸和霧化公司可能引起投資者的關注。
Cigarette manufacturer Altria Group (NYSE:MO) owns the NJOY menthol e-cigarette product that has flavored vapes approved by the FDA. Altria was previously an investor in Juul, a leader in the e-cigarette sector. It eventually exchanged its stake for some intellectual property.
捲菸製造商奧馳亞集團(紐交所:MO)擁有NJOY薄荷味電子煙產品,該產品已獲得FDA批准的調味煙油。奧馳亞此前是電子煙行業領袖Juul的投資者。它最終將其股份交換爲一些知識產權。
Maintaining the FDA's current rules would keep Altria as one of the only companies that can sell approved flavored e-cigarettes. A different decision could see Altria quickly face increased competition.
維持FDA的現行規定將使奧馳亞成爲唯一一家可以銷售獲批准的調味電子煙的公司之一。不同的決定可能會迅速讓奧馳亞面臨日益激烈的競爭。
British American Tobacco (NYSE:BTI) has watched previous attempts to have some vaping products approved denied by the FDA.
英美菸草(紐交所:BTI)目睹了之前一些試圖獲得批准的霧化產品被FDA拒絕。
Turning Point Brands (NYSE:TPI), a past challenger to the FDA's approval process, could benefit if the Supreme Court puts new rules in place.
特朗普概念(紐交所:TPI)曾對FDA的批准流程提出挑戰,如果最高法院制定新規定,可能會受益。
- Social Media Reacts As Juul Users Get Compensation Through Venmo After $300M Class-Action Settlements: 'Vaping Actually Paid Off'
- 社交媒體對Juul用戶通過Venmo獲得30000萬美元集體訴訟和解後的賠償做出反應:「吸電子煙居然有回報」
Image: Shutterstock
圖片:shutterstock
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。