share_log

Is Ingredion (NYSE:INGR) A Risky Investment?

Is Ingredion (NYSE:INGR) A Risky Investment?

宜瑞安(紐交所:INGR)是一項風險投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/01 22:51

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Ingredion Incorporated (NYSE:INGR) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

一些人認爲,作爲投資者,最好的風險思考方式是波動性,而不是債務,但禾倫•巴菲特曾經說過,「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」所以看來,明智的資金都知道,債務是一個非常重要的因素,當你評估一個公司有多大風險時,通常與破產有關。我們可以看到,宜瑞安股份有限公司(紐交所: INGR)的業務中確實使用了債務。但股東們應該擔心它使用債務嗎?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還時,才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資本還是憑藉自身的現金流。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低價發行股票,永久稀釋股東的權益,以強化其資產負債表。當然,有很多公司使用債務來資助增長,沒有任何負面後果。當我們考慮債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does Ingredion Carry?

宜瑞安負債有多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Ingredion had debt of US$1.84b at the end of September 2024, a reduction from US$2.41b over a year. However, it also had US$884.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$956.0m.

下圖顯示了宜瑞安截至2024年9月底的債務爲18.4億美元,較去年減少了24.1億美元。然而,它也有88400萬美元的現金,因此淨債務爲95600萬美元。

big
NYSE:INGR Debt to Equity History December 1st 2024
紐交所: INGR資產負債歷史數據2024年12月1日

How Strong Is Ingredion's Balance Sheet?

宜瑞安的資產負債表有多強?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Ingredion had liabilities of US$1.26b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$2.29b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$884.0m in cash and US$1.15b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.52b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

深入研究最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到宜瑞安有12.6億美元的短期負債,以及超過12個月到期的22.9億美元的負債。 與此相抵,它有8,8400萬美元的現金和11.5億美元的應收賬款即將到期。 因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款合計多15.2億美元。

Since publicly traded Ingredion shares are worth a total of US$9.60b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

由於公開交易的宜瑞安股票總值達到96億美元,這種負債水平似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。 話雖如此,很明顯,我們應該繼續監視其資產負債表,以防惡化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。

Ingredion has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.82. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 17.1 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. The good news is that Ingredion has increased its EBIT by 4.9% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Ingredion's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

宜瑞安的淨債務與EBITDA比率僅爲0.82。 它的EBIt覆蓋其利息開支高達17.1倍。 因此,我們對其超保守地使用債務感到相當放心。 值得高興的是,宜瑞安在過去12個月內將其EBIt增加了4.9%,這應該能減輕對債務償還的擔憂。 毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上最多了解債務。 但是未來的收入,勝過任何其他因素,將決定宜瑞安未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。 因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Ingredion recorded free cash flow worth 56% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,雖然稅務機關可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冰冷的現金。 因此,合乎邏輯的步驟是看看EBIt的比例是否與實際自由現金流相匹配。 在最近三年中,宜瑞安錄得的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIt的56%,這基本屬於正常範圍,考慮到自由現金流不包括利息和稅款。 這種自由現金流使公司在適當時有良好的償還債務的位置。

Our View

我們的觀點

Ingredion's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its net debt to EBITDA is also very heartening. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like Ingredion is pretty sensible with its use of debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example - Ingredion has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

宜瑞安的利息覆蓋表明它幾乎可以像C羅對14歲以下守門員進球一樣輕鬆處理債務。而且,好消息只是開始,因爲其淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比也非常令人欣慰。綜合考慮以上種種因素,宜瑞安在債務使用方面似乎非常明智。雖然這帶來一些風險,但也可以增加股東的回報。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上了解大部分關於債務的內容。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。例如 - 宜瑞安有 1 個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

當一切塵埃落定時,有時更容易專注於那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費查看零淨債務的成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論