Should We Be Cautious About Cushman & Wakefield Plc's (NYSE:CWK) ROE Of 5.2%?
Should We Be Cautious About Cushman & Wakefield Plc's (NYSE:CWK) ROE Of 5.2%?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Cushman & Wakefield plc (NYSE:CWK).
許多投資者仍在學習有用的股票分析指標。這篇文章是給那些想了解股東權益回報率(roe)的人。爲了讓課程更貼近實際情況,我們將使用roe來更好地理解Cushman & Wakefield plc(紐交所:CWK)的情況。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.
股本回報率或roe是一項關鍵指標,用於評估公司管理層使用公司資本的效率。換句話說,它揭示了公司將股東的投資轉化爲利潤的成功。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算淨資產收益率?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
roe可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營) ÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Cushman & Wakefield is:
因此,根據上述公式,Cushman & Wakefield的ROE爲:
5.2% = US$88m ÷ US$1.7b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
5.2% = 8,800萬美元 ÷ 17億美元(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.05 in profit.
「回報」是過去十二個月的利潤。概念化這一點的一種方式是,對於每1美元的股東資本,公司獲得了0.05美元的利潤。
Does Cushman & Wakefield Have A Good Return On Equity?
Cushman & Wakefield的股東權益回報率如何?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Cushman & Wakefield has a lower ROE than the average (6.8%) in the Real Estate industry classification.
通過將一家公司的roe與其行業平均值進行比較,我們可以快速了解其表現如何。這種方法的侷限性在於,有些公司與同一行業分類中的其他公司相比存在明顯差異。如果您查看下面的圖片,您會發現高富帥和其物業行業分類平均roe(6.8%)相比較有所遜色。
Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. That being said, a low ROE is not always a bad thing, especially if the company has low leverage as this still leaves room for improvement if the company were to take on more debt. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books. You can see the 2 risks we have identified for Cushman & Wakefield by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.
不幸的是,這是次優選擇。話雖如此,低roe並不總是壞事,尤其是如果公司槓桿低,這仍然爲公司提供了改進空間,如果公司選擇增加債務。高負債公司的低roe是完全不同的故事,也是我們看來的一種風險投資。您可以訪問我們免費提供的風險儀表盤了解我們爲高富帥確定的兩種風險。
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
債務對股本回報率的重要性
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金來投資業務,以實現盈利增長。這筆資金可以通過發行股份、留存收益或債務獲得。在前兩種情況下,roe將反映這筆現金用於投資業務的情況。在後者中,債務的使用將提高回報,但不會改變股本。因此,債務的使用雖然可以提高roe,但在暴風雨天氣的情況下可能會帶來額外的風險,形象地說。
Cushman & Wakefield's Debt And Its 5.2% ROE
戴德梁行的負債及其5.2%的roe
It's worth noting the high use of debt by Cushman & Wakefield, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.80. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
值得注意的是戴德梁行高額負債,導致其債務與權益比率達到1.80。由於roe相對較低,並且使用了大量債務,目前很難對這家業務感到興奮。負債增加風險,減少了公司未來的選擇,因此您通常希望能夠從中獲得一些良好的回報。
Summary
總結
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
當然,聯合租賃公司可能並不是最佳的買入股票。因此,您可能也希望查看這個包含其他高ROE低負債的公司的免費系列。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是當業務的質量很高時,市場往往會將其推向反映這一點的價格。與股價反映的預期相比,利潤增長率尤爲重要。因此,您可能想要查看這家公司豐富數據的交互式預測圖表。
Of course Cushman & Wakefield may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.
當然,戴德梁行可能不是最適合購買的股票。因此,您可能希望查看這些具有高roe和低債務的其他公司的免費集合。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。