With 73% Institutional Ownership, Principal Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PFG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 73% Institutional Ownership, Principal Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PFG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Principal Financial Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構在財達財務集團的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響
- 該公司共有14個投資者擁有其51%的多數股權。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Principal Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PFG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 73% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着財達財務集團 (納斯達克股票代碼:PFG),那麼你就需要看看它的股東名冊的構成。持有最大股份的是機構,擁有73%的所有權。換句話說,這個機構面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Principal Financial Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究主要金融集團的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Principal Financial Group?
機構持股比例對於Principal Financial Group有什麼意義?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Principal Financial Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Principal Financial Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到主要金融集團確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一個股票,很常見看到股價大跌。因此,值得檢查主要金融集團的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他需要考慮的因素。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Principal Financial Group. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.7% of common stock, and Nissay Asset Management Corporation holds about 7.9% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股票的一半,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對於Principal Financial Group,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有12%的股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有8.7%的普通股,而Nissay Asset Management Corporation持有約7.9%的公司股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記簿中可以看出,51%的股權由前14名股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Principal Financial Group
Principal Financial Group內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Principal Financial Group, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$92m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,Principal Financial Group, Inc. 的內部持有人僅擁有公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只希望內部持有人擁有少量的股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值9200萬美元的股份。可以說,最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這樣的所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益中影響一項政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Principal Financial Group you should know about.
雖然考慮持有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有更重要的因素。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都會有風險,我們已經發現了美國首席金融集團的一個警告信號,您應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。