With 90% Ownership, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE:CHD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 90% Ownership, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE:CHD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Church & Dwight's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 由於機構在股票中的大額持有,Church & Dwight 的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前15名股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
If you want to know who really controls Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE:CHD), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 90% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制了 Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (紐交所:CHD),那麼你必須查看其股份登記的構成。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有90%股份的機構。換句話說,這個群體在對公司的投資中,最有可能獲得最多的收益(或失去最多的損失)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Church & Dwight.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於教堂和德懷特的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Church & Dwight?
機構持股對教堂和德懷特意味着什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Church & Dwight does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Church & Dwight's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到教堂和德懷特確實有機構投資者;而且他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這在專業投資者中暗示了一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時對某隻股票的看法發生變化,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看教堂和德懷特的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Church & Dwight is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. With 8.6% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。教堂與德懷特並不被對沖基金擁有。通過查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是先鋒集團,擁有12%的流通股份。黑石集團和道富環球投資顧問分別持有8.6%和5.4%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在該公司中擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單個股東對該公司具有重大控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Church & Dwight
教堂與德懷特的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Church & Dwight Co., Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$49m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,Church & Dwight Co., Inc. 的內部人士持有不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模如此龐大,我們不期望內部人士持有大量股票。 集體而言,他們持有4900萬美元的股票。 可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。 你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Church & Dwight. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆持有10%的股權,主要由個人投資者組成,對Church & Dwight有一定的影響力。 雖然這部分股權相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,這可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Church & Dwight you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 例如:我們發現了一個你應該注意的Church & Dwight的警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。