With 44% Institutional Ownership, NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE:SMR) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 44% Institutional Ownership, NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE:SMR) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies NuScale Power's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 47% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 顯著高比例的機構持股意味着NuScale Power的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 25位投資者擁有華力創通的多數股份,佔有47%的所有權。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE:SMR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位投資者在NuScale Power Corporation (紐交所:SMR)都應該了解最有權勢的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有44%的絕大部分股份。換句話說,這個群體從對公司的投資中將獲得最多的收益(或遭受最大的損失)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of NuScale Power, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討NuScale Power的每種股東類型,首先查看下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NuScale Power?
機構持股對NuScale Power有什麼啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that NuScale Power does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at NuScale Power's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到NuScale Power確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這在專業投資者中暗示了某種可信度。但我們不能僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看下述NuScale Power的營業收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
NuScale Power is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.7% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.6% and 5.6% of the stock.
NuScale Power並不被對沖基金持有。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,持有7.7%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有大約5.6%和5.6%的股票。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of NuScale Power
NuScale Power的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of NuScale Power Corporation in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$70m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士名下擁有的NuScale Power Corporation的股份不到1%。然而,我們注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。這是一家大公司,因此即使是小比例的利益也能在董事會和股東之間創造一致性。在這種情況下,內部人士擁有價值7000萬美元的股份。看到至少有一些內部人士持股總是好的,但查看這些內部人士是否有賣出股份應該是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶在內的普通公衆擁有該公司43%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視他們。儘管所有權規模相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,這可能還不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 6.6%, of the NuScale Power stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎私人公司擁有NuScale Power股票的6.6%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人身份在一家上市公司中擁有利益。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是進一步研究的一個領域。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 5.1% of NuScale Power stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
目前,上市公司擁有NuScale Power股票的5.1%。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性股份。這些業務可能相似,或者在一起工作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that NuScale Power is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,NuScale Power在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警示信號,其中1個讓我們有點不安...
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。