Great Week for Option Care Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPCH) Institutional Investors After Losing 20% Over the Previous Year
Great Week for Option Care Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPCH) Institutional Investors After Losing 20% Over the Previous Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Option Care Health implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have bought recently
- 機構在option care health中持有大量股份意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響
- 共有13個投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,持股比例爲50%。
- 內部人士最近購買了股票。
A look at the shareholders of Option Care Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPCH) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 68% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察option care health股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。持有最大股份的群體是擁有68%所有權的機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
After a year of 20% losses, last week's 8.6% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.
經過一年的20%虧損,上週的8.6%增長將受到機構投資者的歡迎,可能預示着收益可能開始上升。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Option Care Health.
在下面的圖表中,我們將會詳細查看Option Care Health的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Option Care Health?
機構持股告訴我們Option Care Health的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Option Care Health. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Option Care Health's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Option Care Health中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在他們在進行一種'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險會更高。您可以查看Option Care Health的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Option Care Health is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Wellington Management Group LLP holds about 5.6% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。option care health 不是對沖基金所擁有。BlackRock, Inc. 目前是最大的股東,擁有12%的流通股份。第二大股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc. 擁有12%的普通股,Wellington Management Group LLP持有約5.6%的公司股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Option Care Health
option care health的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Option Care Health, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$25m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有Option Care Health, Inc.不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,董事會成員可能擁有公司中相當大的利益,而並非擁有相對應數量的股份。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約2500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Option Care Health. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有31%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Option Care Health有一定的影響力。雖然這一持股規模可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Option Care Health you should be aware of.
儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。案例證明:我們已經發現了 Option Care Health 你應該注意的 1 個警示信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。