OceanFirst Financial Corp.'s (NASDAQ:OCFC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over Last Week
OceanFirst Financial Corp.'s (NASDAQ:OCFC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.3% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, OceanFirst Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 考慮到機構在股票中的大額持有,oceanfirst financial的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 共有17名投資者擁有該公司50%的股權
- 最近由內部人士出售。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (NASDAQ:OCFC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了oceanfirst financial corp.(納斯達克:OCFC),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。機構持有74%的股份,擁有公司最多的股票。從另一個角度來看,該集團面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下行風險)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 4.3% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 56% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
因此,機構投資者在公司股票價格上週上漲4.3%後獲得了最多的收益。目前一年的投資回報率爲56%,而上週的漲幅無疑是受歡迎的。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of OceanFirst Financial.
在下面的圖表中,我們詳細分析了 oceanfirst financial 的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OceanFirst Financial?
機構持股告訴我們關於 oceanfirst financial 什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
OceanFirst Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of OceanFirst Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
oceanfirst financial 已經在股東名冊上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視了該股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看 oceanfirst financial 過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,需牢記,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in OceanFirst Financial. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Christopher Maher directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對 oceanfirst financial 來說,對沖基金的股份不多。貝萊德公司目前是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有5.9%和5.4%的流通股。此外,該公司的首席執行官克里斯托弗·馬赫直接持有總流通股的0.6%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們擁有的所有權數據的更深入研究表明,前17大股東共擁有50%的股權,這意味着沒有任何一個單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of OceanFirst Financial
oceanfirst financial 的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in OceanFirst Financial Corp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$44m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會對知道內部人士在 oceanfirst financial corp 擁有股份感興趣。內部人士持有價值4400萬美金的實質性股份。大多數人認爲這是一個真正的積極信號。大多數人會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,查看這些內部人士是否有在賣出股份也可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in OceanFirst Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,即通常的個人投資者,持有 oceanfirst financial 23%的股份。儘管這一所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand OceanFirst Financial better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但是爲了更好地理解oceanfirst financial,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。