We Think Maximus (NYSE:MMS) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
We Think Maximus (NYSE:MMS) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Maximus, Inc. (NYSE:MMS) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過,『波動性遠非風險的同義詞。』當我們思考一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡關注它的債務使用,因爲債務過重可能導致毀滅。重要的是,馬克西姆斯服務(紐交所:MMS)確實承擔了債務。但是,股東應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
當一家企業無法輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會變得風險巨大,無論是通過自由現金流還是以有吸引力的價格籌集資金。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,可能會破產。然而,更常見(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以低價稀釋股東,以便僅僅是爲了控制債務。當然,許多公司使用債務來資助增長,而沒有任何負面影響。當我們考慮公司的債務使用時,我們首先將現金和債務結合在一起。
How Much Debt Does Maximus Carry?
馬克西姆斯服務的債務有多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Maximus had US$1.14b of debt in September 2024, down from US$1.25b, one year before. However, it also had US$183.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$952.4m.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示在2024年9月,馬克西姆斯服務的債務爲11.4億美金,較一年前的12.5億美金有所下降。然而,它也有18310萬美金的現金,因此其淨債務爲95240萬美金。
How Strong Is Maximus' Balance Sheet?
馬克西姆斯的資產負債表有多強?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Maximus had liabilities of US$807.5m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.48b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$183.1m and US$884.8m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.22b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
仔細查看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到馬克西姆斯在12個月內有80750萬美元的負債,超過12個月的負債爲14.8億美元。另一方面,它有18310萬美元的現金和88480萬美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款之和高出12.2億美元。
Maximus has a market capitalization of US$4.40b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
馬克西姆斯的市值爲44億美元,因此如果需要,它很可能可以籌集現金以改善其資產負債表。但是我們絕對希望關注其債務帶來過多風險的跡象。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
Maximus has net debt worth 1.6 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 6.0 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. Importantly, Maximus grew its EBIT by 52% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Maximus's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
馬克西姆斯的淨債務約爲EBITDA的1.6倍,這並不算多,但它的利息覆蓋率看起來有點低,EBIT僅爲利息支出的6.0倍。雖然這些數字並未讓我們感到驚慌,但值得注意的是,公司債務的成本正在產生實際影響。重要的是,馬克西姆斯在過去的12個月中將其EBIT增長了52%,這一增長將使其更容易應對債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個好的起點。但未來的收益,尤其是將決定馬克西姆斯維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會覺得這份關於分析師利潤預期的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Maximus recorded free cash flow worth 74% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,雖然稅務機關可能喜愛會計利潤,但貸方只接受冷硬現金。因此,合理的步驟是查看EBIT與實際自由現金流匹配的比例。在最近三年中,馬克西姆斯錄得自由現金流佔EBIT的74%,考慮到自由現金流不包括利息和稅,這大約是正常的。這一自由現金流使公司在適當的時候能夠償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Maximus's impressive EBIT growth rate implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Maximus's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Maximus that you should be aware of.
令人欣慰的是,馬克西姆斯令人印象深刻的EBIT增長率意味着它在債務方面佔據優勢。而且,這一好消息並沒有止步於此,因爲它將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的能力也支持了這一印象!從更大的視角來看,我們認爲馬克西姆斯的債務使用相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。畢竟,合理的槓桿可以提升股本回報。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中對債務的認識最爲深刻。然而,並不是所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠不止於此。例如,我們已經爲馬克西姆斯識別出了一個你應該注意的警告信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。