Celanese (NYSE:CE) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Celanese (NYSE:CE) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过,“波动性与风险远非同义。” 当我们考虑一家公司有多大风险时,我们总是喜欢查看其债务使用情况,因为过度债务可能导致破产。 我们注意到赛莱斯公司(纽交所:CE)确实在其资产负债表上有债务。 但股东们应该担心它的债务使用吗?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
为什么债务会带来风险?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
债务是一种帮助企业增长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还债权人,那么它将完全受制于他们。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能一无所有。然而,更频繁(但仍然昂贵)的情况是公司不得不以低于市价的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东权益,以修复其资产负债表。当然,债务对于企业来说可以是一种重要的工具,特别是对于资本密集型企业。在考虑一家公司的债务水平时的第一步是同时考虑其现金和债务。
What Is Celanese's Net Debt?
赛莱斯的净债务是多少?
As you can see below, Celanese had US$12.8b of debt at September 2024, down from US$13.5b a year prior. However, it does have US$813.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$12.0b.
正如您在下文中所看到的,赛莱斯在2024年9月时有128亿美元的债务,相比前一年的135亿美元有所减少。 然而,它确实有8,1300万美元的现金来抵消这笔债务,从而导致净债务约为120亿美元。
A Look At Celanese's Liabilities
审视赛拉尼斯的负债
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Celanese had liabilities of US$4.16b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$14.0b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$813.0m and US$2.06b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$15.3b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
从最近的资产负债表中我们可以看到,赛拉尼斯一年内到期的负债为41.6亿美元,而到期日后的负债为140亿美元。 另一方面,它拥有81300万美元的现金和20.6亿美元一年内到期的应收账款。 因此,它的负债总额高达153亿美元,超过了现金和近期应收账款的总和。
This deficit casts a shadow over the US$8.36b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Celanese would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
这种赤字笼罩着这家83.6亿美元的公司,就像一个高耸在普通人之上的巨人。 因此,我们确实认为股东们需要密切关注这一点。 总而言之,如果赛拉尼斯的债权人要求偿还债务,它可能需要进行重大的再资本化。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比以及计算其利息支出由收益前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖的程度来度量一家公司的债务负载相对于其收益能力的程度。此方法的优点在于我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(以净债务为EBITDA)以及与该债务相关的实际利息支出(以其利息覆盖倍数计算)。
Weak interest cover of 2.1 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 6.5 hit our confidence in Celanese like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. Fortunately, Celanese grew its EBIT by 5.2% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Celanese can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
赛拉尼斯的利息覆盖率仅为2.1倍,而净债务与EBITDA比率高达6.5倍,这让我们对赛拉尼斯的信心受到重创,就像一记沉重的打击打在胃口上。 这意味着我们认为它承担了沉重的债务负担。 幸运的是,赛拉尼斯在过去一年中EBIT增长了5.2%,相对于收入,逐渐减少了债务。 毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表上了解到最多关于债务情况。 但最终,业务未来的盈利能力将决定赛拉尼斯是否能随着时间加强其资产负债表。 因此,如果您专注于未来,您可以查看此免费报告,其中显示了分析师的利润预测。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Celanese recorded free cash flow worth 78% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最后,一家公司只能用冰冷的现金偿还债务,而不能用会计利润。 因此,逻辑的步骤是审视EBIT中实际自由现金流所占比例。 在过去最近的三年中,赛拉尼斯记录的自由现金流价值占其EBIT的78%,这在正常范围内,因为自由现金流不包括利息和税收。 这份自由现金流使公司有能力在适当时支付债务。
Our View
我们的观点
To be frank both Celanese's net debt to EBITDA and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Overall, we think it's fair to say that Celanese has enough debt that there are some real risks around the balance sheet. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 3 warning signs with Celanese (at least 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
坦率地说,在赛轮的净债务与EBITDA比率以及它始终保持在总负债顶部的记录让我们对其债务水平感到不太舒服。但至少它相当擅长将EBIT转化为自由现金流,这是令人鼓舞的。总体而言,我们认为可以说赛轮的债务足够高,财务报表存在一些真实的风险。如果一切顺利,这将提高回报,但相反,债务会提高永久性资本损失的风险。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的信息是最多的。然而,并非所有的投资风险都来源于资产负债表-远非如此。我们已经确定了3个赛轮的警示信号(至少有1个我们不太满意),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
当然,如果您是那种喜欢购买没有债务负担的股票的投资者,那么不要犹豫,立即发现我们独家的净现金增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。
译文内容由第三方软件翻译。