Okta, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OKTA) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 5.0% Gain Last Week
Okta, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OKTA) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 5.0% Gain Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Okta's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 考慮到機構在股票中擁有的大量股份,okta的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前13名股東佔該公司50%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Okta, Inc. (NASDAQ:OKTA) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看Okta, Inc. (納斯達克:okta) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有85%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的利益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
Last week's 5.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 8.9% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週的5.0%的漲幅意味着,儘管公司顯示出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,股東的年度回報爲8.9%,上週的漲幅更是錦上添花。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Okta.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了okta的不同股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Okta?
機構持股告訴我們關於okta什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Okta already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Okta's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
okta已經在股份登記冊上有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經看過這隻股票,並且看好它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相快速出售股票。此風險在沒有成長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到okta的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是還有更多的內容。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Okta is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 10%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Todd McKinnon is the owner of 3.6% of the company's shares.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。okta並不被對沖基金持有。公司的最大股東是FMR LLC,持有10%的股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有10%和5.9%的流通股份。此外,首席執行官Todd McKinnon持有公司3.6%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Okta
okta的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Okta, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$651m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會對內部人士擁有okta公司股票感興趣。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員 collectively 擁有價值65100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會關注他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Okta. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆擁有10%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對okta有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定能主導,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Okta better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Okta .
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地理解okta,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意到我們發現的okta的一個警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。