These 4 Measures Indicate That Jabil (NYSE:JBL) Is Using Debt Extensively
These 4 Measures Indicate That Jabil (NYSE:JBL) Is Using Debt Extensively
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Jabil Inc. (NYSE:JBL) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有人認爲,作爲投資者,最好的風險思考方式是波動性,而不是債務,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險遠非同義詞。」 當您考慮一個公司有多大風險時,自然會考慮其資產負債表,因爲當一家企業倒閉時通常涉及債務。 和許多其他公司一樣,捷普科技(紐交所:JBL)利用債務。 但是這筆債務是否會讓股東擔憂呢?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
當公司不能輕鬆地滿足債務或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金時,債務和其他負債對其構成風險。資本主義的組成部分是創造性破壞的過程,失敗的企業經常被債權人無情地清算。雖然這並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司因出借人以低廉的價格強迫其發行股票而不得不不斷稀釋股東利益。當然,許多公司使用債務來資助其增長,沒有產生任何負面後果。考慮公司債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務一起考慮。
How Much Debt Does Jabil Carry?
捷普科技負債有多少?
As you can see below, Jabil had US$2.88b of debt, at August 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$2.23b, its net debt is less, at about US$652.0m.
正如下文所示,捷普科技在2024年8月有28.8億美元的債務,與前一年相當。 您可以單擊圖表查看更詳細信息。 但由於其現金儲備爲22.3億美元,其淨債務較少,約爲65200萬美元。
How Healthy Is Jabil's Balance Sheet?
捷普科技的資產負債表有多健康?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Jabil had liabilities of US$11.8b due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.83b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$2.23b and US$4.60b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$8.78b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,捷普科技的一年內到期負債爲118億美元,之後到期的負債爲38.3億美元。另一方面,其現金爲22.3億美元,一年內應收賬款爲46億美元。因此,其負債總計比現金和短期應收賬款的組合多出87.8億美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Jabil has a huge market capitalization of US$14.8b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
雖然這可能看起來很多,但由於捷普科技的市值高達148億美元,所以如果需要的話,它可能通過增加資本來加強其資產負債表。但我們絕對要警惕跡象,表明其債務帶來了太多風險。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。
With net debt sitting at just 0.30 times EBITDA, Jabil is arguably pretty conservatively geared. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 8.4 times the interest expense over the last year. But the bad news is that Jabil has seen its EBIT plunge 10% in the last twelve months. We think hat kind of performance, if repeated frequently, could well lead to difficulties for the stock. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Jabil's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.30倍,捷普科技的財務槓桿可能相當保守。這種觀點得到了紮實的利息覆蓋率的支持,過去一年的EBIT是利息支出的8.4倍。但壞消息是,捷普科技過去十二個月看到其EBIT下降了10%。我們認爲這種性能,如果經常重複,很可能會給股票帶來困難。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是要重點關注的領域。但最終決定捷普科技能否保持健康資產負債表的是未來收益,而不是其他任何因素。如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費報告,顯示分析師的利潤預測。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Jabil's free cash flow amounted to 42% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤不足以償還。因此,值得檢查多少EBIT得到了自由現金流的支持。在過去三年中,捷普科技的自由現金流佔其EBIT的42%,低於我們的預期。這對償還債務來說並不理想。
Our View
我們的觀點
Neither Jabil's ability to grow its EBIT nor its level of total liabilities gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its net debt to EBITDA tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. We think that Jabil's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Jabil (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
捷普科技增長EBIt的能力和總負債水平都沒有讓我們對其承擔更多債務的能力產生信心。但其淨負債與EBITDA的比率卻講述了一個完全不同的故事,並且表明了一些韌性。我們認爲,考慮到上述數據點後,捷普科技的債務確實使其有些風險。這並不一定是件壞事,因爲槓桿可以提高股本回報率,但這也是需要注意的事項。當你分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的領域。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中-遠非如此。例如,我們已發現了捷普科技的3個警示信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂!),在投資前您應該對此有所了解。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
當一切塵埃落定時,有時更容易專注於那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費查看零淨債務的成長股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。