Individual Investors Who Own 34% Along With Institutions Invested in AbCellera Biologics Inc. (NASDAQ:ABCL) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Individual Investors Who Own 34% Along With Institutions Invested in AbCellera Biologics Inc. (NASDAQ:ABCL) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over AbCellera Biologics by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have bought recently
- 個人投資者對abcellera biologics的重大控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更大的影響力。
- 前十大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
- 內部人士最近購買了股票。
If you want to know who really controls AbCellera Biologics Inc. (NASDAQ:ABCL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 34% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了abcellera biologics inc.(納斯達克:ABCL),那麼你需要查看其股權登記的組成。我們可以看到,個人投資者在公司中持有34%的股份,成爲最大的股東。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Following a 11% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 30% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
在上週股票價格上漲11%之後,散戶投資者獲利最多,但持有30%股票的機構也從這一增長中獲益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AbCellera Biologics.
在下圖中,我們詳細分析了abcellera biologics的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AbCellera Biologics?
機構持股給我們帶來了關於abcellera biologics什麼樣的信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
AbCellera Biologics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AbCellera Biologics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
abcellera biologics的股東名冊上已經有機構的名字。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了這隻股票,並對其表示認可。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看以下abcellera biologics的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
It would appear that 9.3% of AbCellera Biologics shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Carl Hansen with 19% of shares outstanding. Baker Bros. Advisors LP is the second largest shareholder owning 9.3% of common stock, and Baillie Gifford & Co. holds about 4.4% of the company stock.
看起來9.3%的abcellera biologics股票被對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金通常相當活躍並且具有激進性。許多基金尋找中期的催化劑來推動股票價格上漲。根據我們的數據,我們看到最大的股東是首席執行官卡爾·漢森,擁有19%的流通股。貝克兄弟顧問LP是第二大股東,持有9.3%的普通股,而貝利·吉福德公司則持有約4.4%的公司股票。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of AbCellera Biologics
abcellera biologics的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in AbCellera Biologics Inc.. Insiders have a US$217m stake in this US$815m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有abcellera biologics inc.的相當大比例股份。內部人士在這家8500萬美元的業務中擁有21700萬美元的股份。這可能意味着創始人仍然擁有大量的股票。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AbCellera Biologics. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆持有34%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對abcellera biologics有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體不一定能掌控決策,但確實能夠對公司的運行產生實質性的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - AbCellera Biologics has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我覺得了解公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。不過,要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,風險 - abcellera biologics 有1個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。