share_log

With 85% Institutional Ownership, Medtronic Plc (NYSE:MDT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 85% Institutional Ownership, Medtronic Plc (NYSE:MDT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

美敦力有85%的机构持股,纽交所股票代码为MDT,是大型机构的最爱。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/25 23:19

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Medtronic's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鉴于机构在该股票中持有大量股份,美敦力的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响
  • 共有25家投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,达到49%的持股比例。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

Every investor in Medtronic plc (NYSE:MDT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 85% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

作为 Medtronic plc(纽交所:MDT)的每位投资者,都应该了解最强有力的股东群体。机构持有公司的85%股份。换句话说,该群体将从他们投资该公司中获得最多(或损失最多)收益。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由于机构股东拥有巨大的资源池和流动资金,他们的投资决策往往承载着很大的权重,特别是对个人投资者来说。因此,机构投入该公司的资金通常是对其未来的极大信心。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Medtronic.

让我们仔细看看股东的不同类型可以告诉我们关于美敦力的什么。

big
NYSE:MDT Ownership Breakdown November 25th 2024
NYSE:MDt所有权分析2024年11月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Medtronic?

机构持有的股权告诉我们什么关于美敦力?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Medtronic already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Medtronic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

美敦力已经有机构在股东名册上。实际上,他们在公司中拥有一部分相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这个事实,因为有时机构也会犯投资错误,就像每个人都会犯一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某只股票,那么看到股价大幅下跌也不罕见。因此值得检查一下美敦力的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:MDT Earnings and Revenue Growth November 25th 2024
美敦力(NYSE:MDt)2024年11月25日盈利和营业收入增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Medtronic. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.6%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.7% and 4.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过公司一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要影响力。对美敦力,对冲基金持有的股份不多。公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,拥有9.6%的所有权。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有8.7%和4.7%的流通股。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Medtronic

美敦力的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Medtronic plc in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$55m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的数据显示,美敦力股份有限公司的内部人士仅以自己的名义持有不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人员持有公司的大部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们持有的股份不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同拥有价值5500万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。在这种情况下,看看这些内部人士是在买入还是卖出可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Medtronic. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般大众,通常是个人投资者,在美敦力持有15%的股份。虽然这一持股比例相当可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Medtronic is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

尽管考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。请注意,美敦力在我们的投资分析中显示了1个警示标志,您应该了解...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发