Does NOV (NYSE:NOV) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does NOV (NYSE:NOV) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies NOV Inc. (NYSE:NOV) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
由伯克希尔·哈撒韦的查理·芒格支持的外部基金经理李录毫不掩饰地表示:‘最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是您是否会遭受资本的永久损失。’当我们考虑一家公司有多危险时,我们总是喜欢关注它的债务使用,因为什么是债务过载会导致毁灭。与许多其他公司一样,华高(纽交所:NOV)也使用债务。但是,真正的问题是这债务是否使公司变得危险。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
总的来说,只有当一家公司无法轻松偿还债务时,负债才会成为真正的问题,要么通过筹集资本,要么通过自有现金流量。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷方会接管企业。然而,更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是公司必须以折价股票发行股票,永久稀释股东,以加强其资产负债表。当然,负债的好处在于它通常代表了廉价资本,尤其是当它替代具有高回报率再投资能力的公司的稀释的情况时。考虑一家企业使用多少债务时,首先要做的是同时查看其现金和债务。
What Is NOV's Debt?
NOV的债务是什么?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that NOV had US$1.75b in debt in September 2024; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has US$985.0m in cash leading to net debt of about US$764.0m.
下图(您可以点击以获取更详细的信息)显示,华高在2024年9月的债务为17.5亿美元;与前一年大致相同。另一方面,它有98500万美元的现金,导致净债务约为76400万美元。
How Strong Is NOV's Balance Sheet?
NOV的资产负债表有多强?
According to the last reported balance sheet, NOV had liabilities of US$2.30b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$2.61b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$985.0m in cash and US$2.58b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.34b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
根据最近公布的资产负债表,NOV的负债为23亿美元,12个月内到期,超过12个月到期的负债为26.1亿美元。相对而言,它有98500万美元的现金和25.8亿美元的应收账款,这些账款在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债总额比现金和即期应收账款的总和多出13.4亿美元。
This deficit isn't so bad because NOV is worth US$6.46b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
这个赤字并不算太糟糕,因为NOV的市值为64.6亿美元,因此在需要时可能能够筹集足够的资本来加强其资产负债表。然而,仔细看看其偿还债务的能力仍然值得关注。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
为了衡量公司债务相对于其收入的规模,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税收、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA),并计算其利息前税利润(EBIT)除以利息支出(其利息覆盖率)。这样,我们考虑了债务的绝对金额,以及支付的利率。
NOV's net debt is only 0.69 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 13.4 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. And we also note warmly that NOV grew its EBIT by 17% last year, making its debt load easier to handle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if NOV can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
NOV的净债务仅为其EBITDA的0.69倍。并且其EBIT覆盖利息支出高达13.4倍。因此,你可以说它的债务对它的威胁就像大象对老鼠的威胁一样小。而且我们还欣喜地注意到,NOV去年的EBIT增长了17%,这使得它的债务负担更加容易应对。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个好的起点。但最终,企业的未来盈利能力将决定NOV能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想知道专业人士的看法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Considering the last three years, NOV actually recorded a cash outflow, overall. Debt is usually more expensive, and almost always more risky in the hands of a company with negative free cash flow. Shareholders ought to hope for an improvement.
最后,一家公司只能用冷硬的现金偿还债务,而不是会计利润。因此,我们显然需要看看该EBIT是否导致相应的自由现金流。考虑到过去三年,NOV实际上记录了整体现金流出。负债通常更昂贵,且在负自由现金流的公司的手中几乎总是更具风险。股东们应该希望能有所改善。
Our View
我们的观点
On our analysis NOV's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. To be specific, it seems about as good at converting EBIT to free cash flow as wet socks are at keeping your feet warm. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that NOV is managing its debt quite well. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with NOV (including 1 which can't be ignored) .
根据我们的分析,华高的利息覆盖率应该表明它在债务方面不会遇到太大困难。但是我们上面提到的其他因素并不是那么令人鼓舞。具体来说,华高在将EBIT转化为自由现金流方面的表现大约和湿袜子保暖的效果一样好。 当我们考虑以上提到的所有因素时,我们认为华高在管理债务方面做得相当不错。话虽如此,负担仍然相当沉重,我们建议任何股东密切关注这一点。 毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学习到的关于债务的知识最多。不过,并非所有投资风险都体现在资产负债表中——远非如此。因此,你应该了解我们发现的华高的三个警示信号(包括一个无法忽视的信号)。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。
译文内容由第三方软件翻译。