With 83% Institutional Ownership, Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 83% Institutional Ownership, Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Alliant Energy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構在美國聯合能源的巨大持股意味着他們對公司股票價格有重要影響。
- 前12個股東持有業務的51%。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看美國聯合能源公司(納斯達克:LNT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。機構持有83%的股份,這使他們在公司中擁有最多的股票。換句話說,這個群體在對公司的投資中最有可能獲得(或失去)收益。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Alliant Energy.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了美國聯合能源的不同持有群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alliant Energy?
機構持股對美國聯合能源有什麼啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Alliant Energy. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Alliant Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在美國聯合能源中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經對該股票進行了分析,並且他們對其表示認可。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面美國聯合能源的盈餘歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Alliant Energy is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 13%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 6.3% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此他們可以共同擁有顯著的權力。美國聯合能源並不被對沖基金所擁有。該公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,擁有13%的股份。黑巖公司是第二大股東,擁有9.0%的普通股, 道富銀行全球顧問公司大約持有該公司6.3%的股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
考慮到前12名股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Alliant Energy
美國聯合能源的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Alliant Energy Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$32m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,美國聯合能源公司內部人士擁有該公司的股份不足1%。由於這是一家大型公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值3200萬美元的股票。總是好的看到至少有一些內部持股,但可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有公司17%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這種擁有量相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Alliant Energy better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Alliant Energy (1 doesn't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of.
了解擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考。但要更好地了解美國聯合能源,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如,我們已經發現美國聯合能源有2個警告信號(其中一個令我們感到不太舒服),你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。