share_log

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

廚師倉庫(納斯達克:CHEF)在使用債務時承擔了一些風險
Simply Wall St ·  11/25 18:41

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHEF) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

霍華德·馬克斯很好地表述了這一點,他說,與其擔心分享價格的波動,不如說『我擔心的風險是永久性損失的可能性……我認識的每一個實際投資者也都擔心這一點。』所以聰明的錢知道,債務 - 通常與破產相關 - 是評估公司風險時一個非常重要的因素。我們可以看到,The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.(納斯達克:CHEF)在其業務中確實使用了債務。但是更重要的問題是:這些債務帶來了多少風險?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以有利價格募資來輕鬆履行債務和其他負債時,債務和其他負債對企業就會構成風險。資本主義的一部分是「創意毀滅」的過程,其中銀行家們無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,更頻繁但仍然昂貴的情況是公司必須以基準價格發行股票來穩定其資產負債表,從而永久性地稀釋股東。當然,對於資本密集型企業,債務可能是一個重要的工具。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用時,我們首先會看現金和債務的總和。

What Is Chefs' Warehouse's Debt?

Chefs' Warehouse的債務是多少?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Chefs' Warehouse had US$680.6m in debt in September 2024; about the same as the year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$50.7m, its net debt is less, at about US$629.9m.

下面的圖表(您可以點擊查看更多細節)顯示,Chefs' Warehouse在2024年9月的債務爲68060萬美元;與前一年大致相同。但是,由於它有5070萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,約爲62990萬美元。

big
NasdaqGS:CHEF Debt to Equity History November 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:CHEF債務與股本歷史 2024年11月25日

How Strong Is Chefs' Warehouse's Balance Sheet?

廚師倉庫的資產負債表有多強?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Chefs' Warehouse had liabilities of US$429.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$864.2m due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$50.7m and US$360.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$882.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

根據最近報告的資產負債表,廚師倉庫在12個月內有42910萬美元的負債,12個月後有86420萬美元的負債。另一方面,它有5070萬美元的現金和36000萬美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比它的現金和短期應收賬款的總和多88260萬美元。

Chefs' Warehouse has a market capitalization of US$1.77b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

廚師倉庫的市值爲17.7億美元,因此如果需要,它很可能籌集現金以改善其資產負債表。但顯然,我們應該仔細檢查它能否在不稀釋的情況下管理債務。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

爲了衡量公司相對於其收益的債務情況,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨負債與 EBITDA),又考慮到了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。

While we wouldn't worry about Chefs' Warehouse's net debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.5, we think its super-low interest cover of 2.5 times is a sign of high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. However, one redeeming factor is that Chefs' Warehouse grew its EBIT at 17% over the last 12 months, boosting its ability to handle its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Chefs' Warehouse's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

雖然我們不會擔心廚師倉庫的淨債務與EBITDA的比率爲3.5,但我們認爲其超低的利息覆蓋率爲2.5倍是高槓杆的跡象。因此,股東們應該意識到,利息費用似乎確實對最近的業務產生了影響。然而,一個值得注意的因素是,廚師倉庫在過去12個月內,EBIT增長了17%,增強了其處理債務的能力。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中最能了解債務。但未來的收益,尤其重要,將決定廚師倉庫未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這份免費的報告,顯示分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Chefs' Warehouse barely recorded positive free cash flow, in total. Some might say that's a concern, when it comes considering how easily it would be for it to down debt.

最後,一家公司只能用現金償還債務,而不能用會計利潤來償還。因此,我們總是檢查EBIT有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,廚師倉庫幾乎沒有記錄正的自由現金流。考慮到它償還債務的難易程度,一些人可能會對此表示關注。

Our View

我們的觀點

While Chefs' Warehouse's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow makes us cautious about it, its track record of covering its interest expense with its EBIT is no better. At least its EBIT growth rate gives us reason to be optimistic. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Chefs' Warehouse's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Chefs' Warehouse you should know about.

雖然廚師倉庫將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流讓我們對其持謹慎態度,但其用EBIT覆蓋利息支出的記錄也不理想。至少,其EBIT增長率讓我們有理由保持樂觀。綜合考慮上述因素,我們確實認爲廚師倉庫的債務給業務帶來了一些風險。因此,儘管這種槓桿提升了股本回報,我們不希望它在此基礎上繼續增加。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個好的起點。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠非如此。這些風險可能很難被發現。每家公司都有這些風險,而我們發現了一個你需要知道的廚師倉庫的預警信號。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論