With 75% Ownership, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (NYSE:MPC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 75% Ownership, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (NYSE:MPC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Marathon Petroleum's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構擁有的股份比例高意味着馬拉松原油的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 前25大股東擁有該公司的49%。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
If you want to know who really controls Marathon Petroleum Corporation (NYSE:MPC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 75% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果想知道誰真正控制着馬拉松原油公司(紐交所:MPC),那麼你就必須看看它的股東註冊情況。而持有最大股份的是擁有75%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個機構群體將獲益最多(或者如果市場出現下滑則損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Marathon Petroleum.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關馬拉松原油的情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marathon Petroleum?
機構持股向我們透露了什麼關於馬拉松原油公司的信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Marathon Petroleum. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Marathon Petroleum's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在馬拉松原油中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過該股票,並且他們看好它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一看馬拉松原油下面的盈利歷史。當然,真正重要的是未來。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Marathon Petroleum is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 10.0% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 7.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。馬拉松原油不是由對沖基金持有的。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, 公司,持有10.0%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的7.9%和7.0%。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Marathon Petroleum
馬拉松原油的內部股份所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Marathon Petroleum Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$98m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,馬拉松原油公司的內部持股不到公司總股本的1%。由於這是一家大型公司,我們只期望內部持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值9800萬美元的股份。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但也值得注意的是是否有內部持股購買行爲。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in Marathon Petroleum. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在馬拉松原油中持有24%的股份。儘管這一持股比例相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Marathon Petroleum is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,馬拉松原油出現了3個警示信號,其中有1個讓我們感到不太舒服...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。