Institutional Investors in GRAIL, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRAL) Have Had a Wonderful Week After Share Price Increased 12%
Institutional Investors in GRAIL, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRAL) Have Had a Wonderful Week After Share Price Increased 12%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in GRAIL implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在GRAIL的 substantial 持有意味着他們對公司股價有顯著影響。
- 前8大股東擁有該公司的51%。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of GRAIL, Inc. (NASDAQ:GRAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看GRAIL公司的股東(納斯達克:GRAL)可以告訴我們哪個集團最有權勢。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有48%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Clearly, institutional investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$57m last week.
顯然,機構投資者在公司市值上週增長5700萬美元后受益最大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about GRAIL.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於GRAIL的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GRAIL?
機構持股告訴我們關於GRAIL什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in GRAIL. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of GRAIL, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在GRAIL中擁有相當一部分股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師查看了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下GRAIL過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.9% of GRAIL. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Illumina, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. CRCM L.P. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Sessa Capital IM, L.P. holds about 8.9% of the company stock.
我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有GRAIL 8.9%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。Illumina, Inc.目前是公司最大的股東,持有13%的流通股。CRCm L.P.是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,而Sessa Capital Im, L.P.持有大約8.9%的公司股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
內部人員擁有佛山藍火箭電子股份有限公司的重要比例。內部人員在這家69億元人民幣的企業中持有25億元人民幣的股份,看到內部人員如此投資是很好的。如果這些內部人員最近一直在購買,那就值得檢查。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of GRAIL
GRAIL內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that GRAIL, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It has a market capitalization of just US$555m, and the board has only US$3.9m worth of shares in their own names. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,GRAIL, Inc. 的內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。 該公司的市值僅爲55500萬美元,而董事會在自己名下的股份僅價值390萬美元。許多小公司的投資者更希望看到董事會有更多投資。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司擁有19%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定大局,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生實際影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 11% stake in GRAIL. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
股權投資公司持有GRAIL 11%的股份。這表明他們可能在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲股權投資有時會成爲行動主義者,讓管理層負責。但有時,股權投資在將公司上市後會選擇退出。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 13% of GRAIL. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們認爲上市公司擁有GRAIL 13%的股份。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性股份。這些業務可能相似,或合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - GRAIL has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,GRAIL有2個我們認爲你應該注意的警告信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。