With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Mondelez International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著高的機構持有意味着億滋的股票價格對其交易行爲敏感。
- 總共有25個投資者擁有公司的多數股份,佔有50%的所有權
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察億滋國際公司(納斯達克:MDLZ)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。而持有最大份額的群體是機構,擁有81%的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Mondelez International, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解億滋國際的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mondelez International?
機構投資的所有權告訴我們關於億滋國際的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Mondelez International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Mondelez International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到億滋國際確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這表明公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽。然而,最好小心依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看億滋國際的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Mondelez International. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.8%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.1% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.5% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 對沖基金在億滋的股份不多。 該公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,擁有9.8%的股份。 貝萊德是第二大股東,持有7.1%的普通股,而道富銀行全球顧問公司持有約4.5%的公司股票。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Mondelez International
億滋的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Mondelez International, Inc.. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$118m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士持有億滋國際公司不到1%的股份。 這是一個非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士持有公司較大比例的股份將是令人驚訝的。儘管他們的持有量不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員合計持有價值11800萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。 看到至少有一些內部人士持股總是好的,但可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Mondelez International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆持有19%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對億滋國際公司有一定的影響力。 這種持有規模雖可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Mondelez International that you should be aware of before investing here.
我發現了解公司具體是誰擁有的非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現億滋有一個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該意識到這一點。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。