Institutional Investors Are Compass, Inc.'s (NYSE:COMP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$260m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Compass, Inc.'s (NYSE:COMP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$260m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Compass' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 鑑於機構在該股票中擁有大量股份,指南針的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前8大股東擁有該公司的51%。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Compass, Inc. (NYSE:COMP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 56% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
爲了了解誰真正控制着指南針公司(NYSE:COMP),重要的是理解企業的所有權結構。 機構佔有該公司56%的股份。 換句話說,該組織面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$3.5b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 224%.
上週,當公司市值達到35億美元時,機構投資者最終受益最多。上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前達到224%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Compass.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Compass的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Compass?
機構持股比例告訴我們哪些信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Compass already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Compass' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Compass已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了股票並喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下降。因此,值得看看Compass的下面收益歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Compass is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that SB Investment Advisers (UK) Limited is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 13% and 9.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and FMR LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Robert Reffkin is the owner of 4.6% of the company's shares.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們集體擁有相當大的權力。 Compass並不是對沖基金所有。 我們的數據顯示,Sb投資顧問(英國)有限公司是持有13%流通股的最大股東。 Vanguard Group, Inc.和FMR LLC分別持有13%和9.2%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。 此外,首席執行官Robert Reffkin擁有公司股份的4.6%。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步了解,前8大股東持有該公司約51%的註冊股份,這意味着除了更大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Compass
Compass的內部股東
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Compass, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$181m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,公司高管持有一定數量的Compass公司股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是很好的。高管持有價值18100萬美元的股份(按目前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會利益的一致性。不過,仍然值得檢查一下這些高管是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Compass. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有26%的所有權,一般大衆,主要是個人投資者,對Compass公司有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能還不足以左右政策決定的走向,他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 13%, private equity firms could influence the Compass board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
擁有13%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響Compass董事會。有時我們會看到股權投資公司長揸股份,但一般來說,他們的投資時間較短,並且--顧名思義--不太投資公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並在其他地方重新配置資本。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Compass you should know about.
我發現查看公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現Compass有1個警告標誌,您應該了解。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。