Following a 24% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) Institutional Owners
Following a 24% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Matthews International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 53% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在馬修國際的大量持股意味着它們對公司股價有着重大影響
- 前8大股東持有該公司53%的股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
Every investor in Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ:MATW) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
納斯達克馬修國際公司(NASDAQ:MATW)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。 機構擁有83%的股份,在公司中擁有最大的股份。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將受益最多(或者如果出現下行,則會損失最多)。
After a year of 24% losses, last week's 7.5% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.
經過一年24%的虧損後,上週7.5%的增長將受到機構投資者的歡迎,可能表明回報率可能開始上升。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Matthews International.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關馬修國際的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Matthews International?
機構持股能告訴我們有關馬修國際的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Matthews International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Matthews International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
馬修國際已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。確實,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定可信度。但我們不能僅憑這一事實就依賴於它,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下馬修國際以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Matthews International. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. With 11% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Joseph Bartolacci is the owner of 1.5% of the company's shares.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要權力。我們注意到對於馬修國際來說,對沖基金並沒有一項實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是黑石集團,持有15%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是先鋒集團和哥倫比亞管理投資顧問公司,持有11%和5.5%的流通股。此外,首席執行官Joseph Bartolacci擁有公司1.5%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了進一步的調查,發現前8大股東佔註冊股份的大約53%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Matthews International
馬修國際的內部持股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Matthews International Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$737m, and insiders have US$31m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,內部人確實持有馬修國際公司的股份。其市值僅爲73700萬美元,並且內部人以自己的名義持有3100萬美元的股份。這至少顯示出某種程度的一致性。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Matthews International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆(通常是個人投資者)持有馬修國際的13%股份。雖然這個群體不一定能左右公司的決策,但肯定能對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Matthews International (of which 2 are a bit concerning!) you should know about.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同團體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現馬修國際有3個警示跡象(其中2個有點令人擔憂!)這些都是您應該了解的。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。