Additional Considerations Required While Assessing Madison Square Garden Entertainment's (NYSE:MSGE) Strong Earnings
Additional Considerations Required While Assessing Madison Square Garden Entertainment's (NYSE:MSGE) Strong Earnings
Despite announcing strong earnings, Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s (NYSE:MSGE) stock was sluggish. We think that the market might be paying attention to some underlying factors that they find to be concerning.
儘管宣佈強勁的收入,madison square garden entertainment corp.(紐交所:MSGE)的股票表現疲軟。我們認爲市場可能正關注一些他們認爲令人擔憂的潛在因素。
A Closer Look At Madison Square Garden Entertainment's Earnings
深入了解madison square garden entertainment的盈利情況
As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.
正如金融迷所知,現金流量的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與盈利狀況匹配程度的重要指標。要獲得應計比率,我們首先要將某個時期的FCF從盈利中減去,然後將該數字除以該時期的平均經營資產。這個比率告訴我們公司多少盈利沒有由自由現金流備支。
That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.
這意味着負的計提比率是一件好事,因爲它表明公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所暗示的要多。雖然擁有正的計提比率毫無問題,表明某種程度的非現金利潤,但高的計提比率則是一個壞信號,因爲這表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,高的計提比率對近期利潤總體上是一個壞兆頭。
Over the twelve months to September 2024, Madison Square Garden Entertainment recorded an accrual ratio of 0.23. Therefore, we know that it's free cashflow was significantly lower than its statutory profit, which is hardly a good thing. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$56m in the last year, which was a lot less than its statutory profit of US$175.7m. Madison Square Garden Entertainment's free cash flow actually declined over the last year, but it may bounce back next year, since free cash flow is often more volatile than accounting profits. Importantly, we note an unusual tax situation, which we discuss below, has impacted the accruals ratio. This would certainly have contributed to the weak cash conversion. One positive for Madison Square Garden Entertainment shareholders is that it's accrual ratio was significantly better last year, providing reason to believe that it may return to stronger cash conversion in the future. Shareholders should look for improved cashflow relative to profit in the current year, if that is indeed the case.
在截至2024年9月的12個月內,madison square garden entertainment的計提比率爲0.23。因此,我們知道它的自由現金流明顯低於其法定利潤,這絕不是一件好事。事實上,去年它的自由現金流爲5600萬美元,遠低於其法定利潤的17570萬美元。madison square garden entertainment的自由現金流實際上已經在過去一年內下降,但可能會在明年反彈,因爲自由現金流往往比會計利潤更不穩定。值得注意的是,我們注意到有一個異常的稅收情況,我們將在下面討論,這影響了計提比率。這肯定會導致現金轉換較弱。對madison square garden entertainment股東來說,一個積極因素是它的計提比率去年明顯更好,這表明它可能會在未來恢復更強勁的現金轉換。如果確實如此,股東應尋求當年改善的現金流與利潤之比。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
An Unusual Tax Situation
一種不尋常的稅務情況
In addition to the notable accrual ratio, we can see that Madison Square Garden Entertainment received a tax benefit of US$105m. This is meaningful because companies usually pay tax rather than receive tax benefits. The receipt of a tax benefit is obviously a good thing, on its own. However, the devil in the detail is that these kind of benefits only impact in the year they are booked, and are often one-off in nature. In the likely event the tax benefit is not repeated, we'd expect to see its statutory profit levels drop, at least in the absence of strong growth.
除了值得注意的應計比率外,我們還可以看到麥迪遜廣場花園娛樂公司獲得了10500萬美元的稅收優惠。這是有意義的,因爲公司通常是交稅而不是獲得稅收優惠。單獨看來,獲得稅收優惠顯然是一件好事。然而,問題的關鍵在於,這類好處只在記賬年度產生影響,而且通常是一次性的。如果稅收優惠不再重複發生,我們預計其稅前利潤水平會下降,至少在沒有強勁增長的情況下。
Our Take On Madison Square Garden Entertainment's Profit Performance
我們對麥迪遜廣場花園娛樂公司的利潤表現的看法
Madison Square Garden Entertainment's accrual ratio indicates weak cashflow relative to earnings, which perhaps arises in part from the tax benefit it received this year. If the tax benefit is not repeated, then profit would drop next year, all else being equal. Considering all this we'd argue Madison Square Garden Entertainment's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. To help with this, we've discovered 4 warning signs (3 are concerning!) that you ought to be aware of before buying any shares in Madison Square Garden Entertainment.
麥迪遜廣場花園娛樂公司的應計比率顯示,相對於收入,現金流較弱,這或許部分源於其今年獲得的稅收優惠。如果稅收優惠不再重複,那麼利潤將在下一年下降,其他條件相等。考慮到這一切,我們認爲麥迪遜廣場花園娛樂公司的利潤可能給出了一個過高的可持續盈利水平的印象。鑑於此,如果您想對該公司進行更多分析,了解涉及的風險至關重要。爲了幫助您,我們發現了4個警示信號(其中3個令人擔憂!),在購買麥迪遜廣場花園娛樂公司股票之前,您應該注意這些。
Our examination of Madison Square Garden Entertainment has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.
我們對麥迪遜廣場花園娛樂公司的審查側重於某些因素,這些因素可能使其收益看起來比實際情況更好。基於這一點,我們對此持懷疑態度。但還有很多其他方法可以了解公司的情況。有些人認爲高股本回報率是一個優質企業的良好跡象。儘管這可能需要您做一些研究,但您可能會發現這個擁有高股本回報率的公司收藏或者這份擁有重要內部持股的股票名單對您有幫助。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。