RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 83% of the Company
RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 83% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, RPM International's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由於機構在股票中的大額持股,rpm international的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前12名股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正掌控rpm international inc. (紐交所:RPM),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司最多股份的團體,具體來說是約83%,是機構。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該團體將受益最大(如果出現下跌,則損失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about RPM International.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於rpm international的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RPM International?
機構持股對我們了解rpm international的意義是什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
RPM International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RPM International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
rpm international已經在股票登記冊上有機構的存在。實際上,他們在公司中擁有一份可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司來說,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到rpm international的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的故事。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RPM International. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Aristotle Capital Management, LLC holds about 7.1% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank Sullivan is the owner of 0.8% of the company's shares.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在rpm international的持股不多。先鋒集團目前是公司的最大股東,持有11%的流通股份。貝萊德是第二大股東,擁有10%的普通股票,亞里士多德資本管理有限公司持有大約7.1%的公司股票。此外,首席執行官Frank Sullivan持有0.8%的公司股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過一些調查,我們發現前12名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of RPM International
rpm國際的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in RPM International Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$218m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到內部人擁有rpm international inc.的股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共同擁有價值21800萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 我們有時會關注他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RPM International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是散戶投資者,在rpm international中持有16%的股份。 雖然這一群體並不一定能夠決定一切,但它確實能對公司的運行產生真實的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - RPM International has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲取洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 比如風險 - rpm international有 2 個警示信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。