While Individual Investors Own 33% of CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 54% Ownership
While Individual Investors Own 33% of CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 54% Ownership
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in CapitaLand Investment indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 54% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd.)
- 13% of CapitaLand Investment is held by Institutions
- 私人公司在凱德置地投資中擁有相當大的所有權,這表明它們在管理和業務策略方面共同擁有更大的發言權。
- 該公司54%的股份由單一股東(巴特利投資私人有限公司)持有。
- 凱德置地投資13%的股份被機構持有。
A look at the shareholders of CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看凱德置地投資有限公司(新加坡交易所:9CI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。我們可以看到私人公司在該公司中擁有佔比最高的54%所有權。換句話說,該群體在對公司的投資中可以獲得最多的利潤(或者承擔最大的風險)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 33% of the company's shareholders.
同時,個人投資者佔公司股東的33%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CapitaLand Investment.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了新加坡交易所9CI股票的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CapitaLand Investment?
機構所有權告訴我們關於凱德投資的什麼問題?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CapitaLand Investment. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CapitaLand Investment's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在新加坡交易所9CI股票中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但僅憑這一事實是不夠的,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在它們是在一種「人群交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到新加坡交易所9CI的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事中始終有更多內容。
CapitaLand Investment is not owned by hedge funds. Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 54% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.2% and 2.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
凱德投資不是由對沖基金持有。 巴特利投資私人有限公司目前是該公司持有的最大股東,持有54%的股份。 由於擁有如此大比例的所有權,我們推斷他們對公司未來有着重大的控制權。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有2.2%和2.1%的流通股。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of CapitaLand Investment
凱德投資的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CapitaLand Investment Limited in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own S$28m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據表明,內部持有不到凱德投資有限公司1%的股份。然而,我們注意到,內部人員可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。 作爲一家如此大的公司,我們並不期望內部人員持有大量股票。他們共持有2800萬新加坡元的股票。可以認爲最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CapitaLand Investment. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有33%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對凱德投資有一定的影響力。雖然這種股權規模可能不足以左右對他們有利的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 54%, of the CapitaLand Investment stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司擁有凱德投資54%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得深入了解是誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過獨立的私人公司持有公共公司股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for CapitaLand Investment you should be aware of, and 2 of them shouldn't be ignored.
我覺得看看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正深入了解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。 舉個例子:我們發現凱德投資存在3個警示信號,您應該注意,其中2個不容忽視。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。