With 70% Institutional Ownership, Lennox International Inc. (NYSE:LII) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 70% Institutional Ownership, Lennox International Inc. (NYSE:LII) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lennox International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構持股比例高意味着雷諾士的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 前13大股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Lennox International Inc. (NYSE:LII) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
分析雷諾士國際公司(紐交所:LII)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,佔有70%。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lennox International, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解雷諾士的每一類型股東,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lennox International?
機構持股告訴我們關於雷諾士的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Lennox International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lennox International, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
雷諾士已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。確實,他們在公司中擁有一定比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴於這一事實,因爲有時機構會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查雷諾士的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Lennox International is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and Norris Family Limited Partnership holds about 7.1% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要影響力。雷諾士並不是由對沖基金擁有。黑石集團目前是該公司最大的股東,持有10%的股份。領先集團是第二大股東,擁有9.1%的普通股,Norris Family Limited Partnership持有約7.1%的公司股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Lennox International
雷諾士國際的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Lennox International Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$701m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,雷諾士國際有限公司的內部持有一些股票。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有價值70100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會對他們是在買入還是賣出感興趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有公司的20%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不能必然佔據主導地位,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 7.1%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的7.1%。值得進一步深入了解。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一傢俬人公司擁有利益,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Lennox International has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同團體非常重要,但有其他更重要的因素。以風險爲例-雷諾士有2個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。