Institutional Owners May Ignore Ball Corporation's (NYSE:BALL) Recent US$767m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Ball Corporation's (NYSE:BALL) Recent US$767m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ball's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 顯著的高機構持股意味着Ball的股票價格對其交易行爲很敏感。
- 前12個股東持有業務的51%。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
A look at the shareholders of Ball Corporation (NYSE:BALL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看Ball Corporation(紐交所代碼:BALL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有絕大多數股份,達到86%的持有比例。也就是說,這個群體在股票上漲時最多受益(或在下跌時損失最多)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$18b last week. Still, the 13% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
機構投資者在上週公司市值下降至180億美元后受到的影響最大。然而,13%的年收益可能有助於減少他們的整體損失。不過,他們應該注意未來可能出現的進一步損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ball.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們什麼關於Ball的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ball?
機構持股對Ball的意義是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ball. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ball, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所見,機構投資者在Ball中擁有相當比例的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股票價格大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看Ball的過去收益軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Ball is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 7.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投資者應注意,機構實際上持有公司一半以上的股份,因此他們可以共同發揮重要作用。Ball並不由對沖基金持有。公司的最大股東是先鋒集團(The Vanguard Group, Inc.),持有12%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.9%和7.4%的流通股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
考慮到前12名股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Ball
Ball的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Ball Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$112m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己名義擁有Ball Corporation不到1%的股份。 這是一家非常大型的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有公司大比例的股份會令人感到驚訝。儘管他們的持有量不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員集體擁有價值11200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下那些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有公司的13%股權,因此不能被輕易忽略。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們有利時推動政策決策,但他們仍可以共同影響公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Ball you should be aware of, and 2 of them are concerning.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更加關鍵。舉個例子:我們發現了3個關於Ball的警告跡象,你應該注意,其中有2個是令人擔憂的。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。