Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s (NYSE:NCLH) Institutional Investors Lost 3.5% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s (NYSE:NCLH) Institutional Investors Lost 3.5% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在挪威郵輪控股公司的 substantial holdings 意味着他們對公司股價擁有重要影響力。
- 該公司共有14個投資者擁有其51%的多數股權。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:NCLH) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看挪威郵輪控股有限公司(紐交所:NCLH)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們看到機構在公司中擁有75%的股份。換句話說,這個群體從對公司的投資中獲得最多的收益(或承受最多的損失)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$12b last week. Still, the 83% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
機構投資者是最受影響的群體,因爲該公司的市值上週降至120億美金。不過,83%的年度收益可能幫助減輕了他們的整體損失。然而,我們假設他們將會關注未來的弱點。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於挪威郵輪控股公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings?
機構所有權告訴我們關於挪威郵輪控股公司什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在挪威郵輪控股公司中擁有相當的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個參與者可能會爭相快速出售股票。對於一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以看到挪威郵輪控股公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是還有更多。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.5% of the stock.
機構投資者持有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強有力地影響董事會的決策。 挪威郵輪公司並不被對沖基金所擁有。 公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,擁有12%的股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約12%和6.5%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記簿中可以看出,51%的股權由前14名股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings
挪威郵輪公司的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$71m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內幕人士持有挪威郵輪公司少於1%的股份。由於它是一家大型公司,我們只期望內幕人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值7100萬美元的股票。看到至少有一些內幕持股總是不錯,但可能值得檢查一下這些內幕人士是否在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆持有25%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對挪威郵輪公司有一定的影響力。雖然這種規模的持股可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.
我發現研究一個公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已識別出挪威郵輪控股公司存在3個警告信號(1個不能忽視),您應該注意這些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。