Rapid7's (NASDAQ:RPD) Strong Earnings Are Of Good Quality
Rapid7's (NASDAQ:RPD) Strong Earnings Are Of Good Quality
Rapid7, Inc. (NASDAQ:RPD) just reported healthy earnings but the stock price didn't move much. We think that investors have missed some encouraging factors underlying the profit figures.
Rapid7,Inc. (納斯達克:RPD)剛剛報告了健康的收益,但股價沒有多大波動。我們認爲投資者忽略了一些鼓舞人心的因素,這些因素是利潤數據底層的支撐。
Examining Cashflow Against Rapid7's Earnings
審查現金流與Rapid7的盈利情況
As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.
作爲金融迷,大家應該已經知道,從現金流量中的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與利潤匹配情況的關鍵指標之一。 換句話說,該比率將FCF從淨利潤中扣除,並將該數值除以公司在該期間內的平均營運資產。 該比率顯示我們公司盈利超過了自由現金流的多少。
Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.
因此,當一家公司的應計比率變爲負數時,這實際上是一件好事,但如果應計比率是正數,則是一件壞事。雖然應計比率爲正數並不是問題,這表明一定程度的非現金利潤,但高應計比率被認爲是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤無法與現金流相匹配。值得注意的是,一些學術證據表明,高應計比率通常是近期利潤的一個不好的跡象。
For the year to September 2024, Rapid7 had an accrual ratio of -0.23. That implies it has very good cash conversion, and that its earnings in the last year actually significantly understate its free cash flow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$155m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$47.1m. Rapid7's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.
截至2024年9月的一年中,Rapid7的應計比率爲-0.23。這意味着其現金轉換非常良好,去年的盈利實際上大大低估了其自由現金流。換句話說,它在此期間產生了15500萬美元的自由現金流,而其報告的利潤只有4710萬美元。Rapid7的自由現金流在過去一年有所改善,這通常是個好跡象。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
Our Take On Rapid7's Profit Performance
我們對rapid7的盈利表現持看好態度
As we discussed above, Rapid7's accrual ratio indicates strong conversion of profit to free cash flow, which is a positive for the company. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that Rapid7's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And it's also positive that the company showed enough improvement to book a profit this year, after losing money last year. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Rapid7 (2 are concerning) you should be familiar with.
正如我們之前討論的,Rapid7的應計比率表明了利潤轉化爲自由現金流的強勁情況,這對於公司是一個積極因素。根據這一觀察,我們認爲Rapid7的法定利潤實際上低估了其盈利潛力!公司今年實現盈利,與去年虧損形成鮮明對比,這也是積極的。歸根結底,如果你想更全面地了解這家公司,不僅僅需要考慮以上因素。因此,如果你想深入了解這隻股票,就必須考慮其面臨的任何風險。例如,我們發現了3個Rapid7的警示信號(其中有2個令人擔憂),你應該對此有所了解。
Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Rapid7's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
今天,我們深入研究了一個數據點,以更好地了解Rapid7利潤的性質。但如果你能夠專注於細微之處,就會發現更多。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報是有利的商業經濟指標,而另一些人則喜歡「跟隨資金」並尋找公司內部人員正在購買的股票。因此,你可能希望查看這個免費的公司收藏,其中包含高股本回報的公司,或者查看這份具有高內部持股比例的股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。